I've implemented two pairs of clustered SRX240s for one of my networks. HA is
fairly simple to set up, and seems to work fairly well. sessions tables are
replicated between the cluster, but active routing is not, so you're going to
be using a active/standby scenario with them for now.
I'm actua
The SRX is able to meet all of these requirements. I would highly recommend
the SRX650.
In regards to the HA - I personally feel it's really good. It isn't a
traditional HA setup where the passive firewall is completely unusable and just
an insurance policy until there's a failure. The SRX H
> -Original Message-
> From: Julien Goodwin [mailto:jgood...@studio442.com.au]
> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 11:50 PM
> On 04/02/11 16:12, Ryan Goldberg wrote:
> > watchguard a) is the outbound nat box for about 70 small offices (we are a
> small ISP too, these are fiber-connected cu
On 04/02/11 16:12, Ryan Goldberg wrote:
> watchguard a) is the outbound nat box for about 70 small offices (we are a
> small ISP too, these are fiber-connected customers). it also handles some
> amount of inbound nat for those customer's various servers, which may be in
> the customers office,
Hi-
Totally new here, and I mainly lurk on other lists, so be gentle if possible.
We are in a situation we need to get out of. I am considering a pair of
juniper SRX boxes (240s are in the budget) to do that.
This is what we have:
watchguard a) is the outbound nat box for about 70 small offic
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/community/junos/script-automation/library/operations/cpu-usage-60/
Doug
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Martin T
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 4:50 PM
To: juniper-nsp@p
Hello,
as far as I know, there is no possibility to check CPU or memory
utilization history under JUNOS. Any rumors, will there be "show
processes cpu history" analog for JUNOS in future versions? Or do most
users query CPU and memory utilization over SNMP periodically and draw
graphs in NMS?
reg
Hi Telmo,
Your initial assumtion is correct, the lower end M series can't hash based
on two MPLS label and IP payload, if you configure that it will hash based
on the top label and the IP payload. I believe this is due to a hardware
limitation as a T320 running the exact same code can hash based on
That is because you are most likely attempting to your
rpc-reply directly causing the cli formatting to only display the raw
xml leaf nodes.
If you are looking to just output commands as normal cli rendered
output, you will want to copy your rpc-reply directly to the result-tree
using "copy-
Hi,
If LDP is used for MPLS signaling, and your igp has two equal cost paths
(via two diff interfaces) to the destination you want load balancing, then i
don't see why it shouldn't occur. ECMP is on by default in Junos and yeah
M's can only hash on first mpls label and ip payload, but it shouldn't
That's an interesting idea. I'm checking into that for my lab m20 with adaptive
services pic... An srx240 might make more sense if it'll do it.
Will O'Brien
On Feb 2, 2011, at 5:13 AM, "Phil Mayers" wrote:
> Can anyone tell me if the built-in adaptive services PIC on the M7i will
> support th
Hello,
For example, here's a script that checks OSPF, LDP and BGP neighbors on a box
with 1 commands.
blah@PE1-STJHLab-re0> op status-neighbors
- OSPF: There are 4 active OSPF neighbors. Those neighbors are:
Interface: ge-1/3/9.0 , IP Address: 10.10.81.5 , ID: 10.10.80.3
I
Just to make things clear as mud, NAT64 is a mechanism that does address
and protocol translation or NAT-PT, but it is probably best not to call
it that as "NAT-PT" was an old technique that was defined in an RFC and
was officially abandoned by the IETF. NAT64 is an externally similar
technique th
I think you may to do this for LDP LSPs. My experience is with RSVP LSPs but
the concept should be the same. Multiple LSPs are needed to load balance.
Seems like this command does that with LDP:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.4/topics/usage-guidelines/mpls-configuring-fec-deaggregat
On 03/02/11 16:04, OBrien, Will wrote:
That's an interesting idea. I'm checking into that for my lab m20
with adaptive services pic... An srx240 might make more sense if
it'll do it.
I do have an SRX210, and the SRX docs claim to do it as of JunOS 10.4;
but I am fairly sure it's done using dif
On 03/02/11 14:17, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:33:33 +
From: Phil Mayers
Sender: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
On 02/02/11 19:50, Vlad Ion wrote:
hmm... so NAT64 supported just in 10.4 not in 10.3 as well?
@ Phil - I can tell you how well both NAT-PT and NAT64 will
Do you have multiple LSPs defined (one for each path you want to load
balance over)?
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Telmo Di Leva wrote:
> Dear JNSP, in this oportunity we are contacting you because we have the
> following trouble:
> Our core plataform is based on M20 and M160.
> For some reaso
All,
I'm trying to get a feel for op scripts in JUNOS and I can invoke commands,
but I'm not seeing the output I thought I'd see (it looks like raw data).
What I'd like to do is run a list of show commands with a script alias.
Could someone point me in the right direction to be able to run like
> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:33:33 +
> From: Phil Mayers
> Sender: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
>
> On 02/02/11 19:50, Vlad Ion wrote:
> > hmm... so NAT64 supported just in 10.4 not in 10.3 as well?
> >
> > @ Phil - I can tell you how well both NAT-PT and NAT64 will work on J-series
> >
On 02/02/11 19:50, Vlad Ion wrote:
hmm... so NAT64 supported just in 10.4 not in 10.3 as well?
@ Phil - I can tell you how well both NAT-PT and NAT64 will work on J-series
in about a month when I will be done testing them... even tho it doesn't
match exactly the profile of M7i
Interesting; I d
20 matches
Mail list logo
