Re: [j-nsp] 10.0 or 10.4?

backup-router - Originally we did not have this. Our SE and JTAC suggested it, so we added it. Adding it did not change the situation (we didn't originally need a backup router because fxp0 was being used for inbound-only emergency access from a local subnet IP). I forgot to mention in this thre

Re: [j-nsp] 10.0 or 10.4?

You have a backup-router configured in the re1 group? -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul Zugnoni Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2011 12:21 PM To: juniper-nsp Cc: Richard A Steenbergen Subject: Re: [j-nsp]

Re: [j-nsp] 10.0 or 10.4?

After upgrading from 10.1 to 10.4R1.9 on a set of our dual-RE2000 MX960's we observed that the re1's fxp's were no longer IP-reachable. Console and session to "other-route-engine" both work fine, as does GRES. Same behavior on multiple dual-RE MXs. JTAC has confirmed the group config as OK, but

Re: [j-nsp] disable status vector on juniper router

hello, control-word and status-vector arenot the same. when soing "show vpls connections" you get both : control flags—Indicates whether the control word and sequenced delivery of packets are required. Control flags have 8-bit fields, with the last two bits being C (control word flag) and

[j-nsp] SXR 650 Redundancy Group Problem

Hi Experts I am configuring redundancy group to trigger failover in case of interface failure. I have reth interface for trust zone that has two physical interfaces, one interface on the active node and the other on the passive and the same for reth1 on untrust zone. The target is to make tr

Re: [j-nsp] SRX100

Guys, Thanx for all your help, you really filled in a couple holes. thanx again, mike On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Ben Dale wrote: > I posted something on J-Net a while back comparing IOS and Junos VLAN > configuration - the config examples will work just fine on the SRX100: > > http://f