On Fri, 25 Mar 2011, Jake Jake wrote:
If I can have a config snippit it would be great.
Since a few people asked about this, I figured it would be OK to post to
the list.
The configuration of an 802.1q trunk on a cFPC interface really isn't much
different from configuring an 802.1q trunk o
An Enhanced FPC is required, this is what was throwing me off. I guess I
don't know what is enhanced and what isn't, its not very clear.
I'm testing on m7i/m10i's using the non eCFEB, but I guess they are still
new enough as it seems to work without it.. As this seems to work is the
VPLS bandwidt
The short answer is:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos92/swconfig-vpns/configuring-vpls-without-a-tunnel-services-pic.html
This is meant to just need recent-ish pic's facing the MPLS cloud.
On 28/03/11 09:53, Chris Evans wrote:
> All the communication that we've received from J
Yes it does take some ports and resources to do this. $ for $ the 7K density
is still much cheaper than MX though.
Anyone know if VPLS will be built into EX8200 or Qfabric (doubtful) in the
future?
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Quinn Snyder wrote:
> otv requires a unique vdc (virtual context
>From what I can tell you have to enable tunnel services on the MX module
itself still. If someone can advise whether it does or not that would help
clear up things.. 10Gig ports on MX's on non TRIO modules are at a premium.
The Trio module alone is very expensive too. I wouldn't want to lose ports
otv requires a unique vdc (virtual context) to run, plus the desired
number of interfaces required to interconnect 'edge' with 'lan'
contexts, as there is no backplane interconnect between contexts. oh,
and vdc requires the advanced license (~$30k list). maximum number of
vdc per n7k is 4, as the
Do you have a link for documentation about the 10G interfaces? I was under the
impression you weren't really "stealing" a 10G interface.. if you enable tunnel
services on a 10G interface then you lose an interface, but with
no-tunnel-services I thought you didn't need to do that...
_
All the communication that we've received from Juniper is that they perceive
MPLS and VPLS to be their answer to Cisco's OTV. I've been researching VPLS
on the Juniper platforms and I cannot find any definite information as to
how much it can scale performance/bandwidth wise. VPLS requires either a
8 matches
Mail list logo
