On Wed, 18 May 2011 09:29:25 -0400
Chris Evans wrote:
> How about automatic script sync too
now now, don't be greedy :-)
but yes, that is sorely missing too.
--
Pierfrancesco Caci
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://pu
Hello there,
There are _no_ single release notes doc for 10.4
Link to 10.4R3 release notes
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.4/information-products/topic-collections/release-notes/10.4/junos-release-notes-10.4r3.pdf
Link to 10.4R4 release notes
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/j
Hi all,
I feel like a bit of a newbie asking this (and, relatively speaking, I
am!) because it feels like something that should be fairly
straight-forward. And maybe it is.
Q: Is there a way to determine what has changed between two revisions
of a major JUNOS release?
For argument's sake, how do
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:42:22PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen
wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 05:10:54PM +0100, William J Hulley wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using some EX3200s running 10.0S6.1 and developing a configuration
> > using filter based forwarding to policy route traffic between rou
I am trying to solve some problems and I need a little sanity
check. I have some routers that only support OSPF and I am trying to
integrate this OSPF area/autonomous-system into a level2 IS-IS
area/autonomous-system. Simplified, it looks like this:
IS-IS
OSPF
>>> On 5/18/2011 at 12:20 PM, "Scott T. Cameron" wrote:
> Does anyone have a trick for logging all policies? I'm not particularly
> fond of going and tagging each policy with "log".
>
> Worse, is there a way to flag the default-policy with a log statement? I
> have deny-all and no options that
> -Original Message-
> From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
> boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott T. Cameron
> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 3:20 PM
> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [j-nsp] SRX policy logging
>
> Does anyone have a trick for lo
Does anyone have a trick for logging all policies? I'm not particularly
fond of going and tagging each policy with "log".
Worse, is there a way to flag the default-policy with a log statement? I
have deny-all and no options that follow, would be nice to catch them all
with a log as well.
Scott
Wonderful, thanks!
On 18 May 2011, at 18:42, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 05:10:54PM +0100, William J Hulley wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm using some EX3200s running 10.0S6.1 and developing a configuration
>> using filter based forwarding to policy route traffic between routi
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 05:10:54PM +0100, William J Hulley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using some EX3200s running 10.0S6.1 and developing a configuration
> using filter based forwarding to policy route traffic between routing
> instances.
>
> It's all working fine in the lab but I'm concerned about th
Hi,
I'm using some EX3200s running 10.0S6.1 and developing a configuration using
filter
based forwarding to policy route traffic between routing instances.
It's all working fine in the lab but I'm concerned about the potential growth
of the firewall
policy and utilisation of the TCAM in produc
I personally hate having to do any kind of script that should be built into
the os...
On May 18, 2011 12:03 PM, "Yann Berthier" wrote:
>
> On 2011-05-18, at 9:29 AM, Chris Evans wrote:
>
>> How about automatic script sync too
>>
>
> once you can file copy other-routing-engine:
>
> you just have t
On 2011-05-18, at 9:29 AM, Chris Evans wrote:
> How about automatic script sync too
>
once you can file copy other-routing-engine:
you just have to push that across when doing a script refresh, so problem solved
but yeah, one way or another the point is to be able to sync scripts
- y
_
The sad bit is that I've done Nat on SRX just like that as well.
Thanks for the sanity check. I pulled the lo0 address and poof it works.
Now I'm trying to stack my bandwidth policer with the nat config and hitting a
similar issue.
I think the only way to do both is to put the nat process into a
How about automatic script sync too
On May 18, 2011 9:27 AM, "Yann Berthier" wrote:
>
> On 2011-05-18, at 3:19 AM, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote:
>
>> implement "other-routing-engine" for file operation as well, like it
>> is for request login. It would make updating stuff (namely the
>> scripts) a bre
On 2011-05-18, at 3:19 AM, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote:
> implement "other-routing-engine" for file operation as well, like it
> is for request login. It would make updating stuff (namely the
> scripts) a breeze.
that would be most welcome indeed
- y
__
Yes, but the system mountes them from root so if we have corrupted root,
the system will not boot.
On 18.05.2011 1:09, Stacy W. Smith wrote:
That's probably not worth the hassle. The operating system is already mounted
as a set of read-only memory-disk file systems from ISO images embedded wi
On Tue, 17 May 2011 14:51:32 -0400
Phil Shafer wrote:
> "Cyn D." writes:
> >I tried to copy(ftp) jinstall file to backup RE but for some reason
> >the Mgmt port on bac kup RE is not responsive. Then tried to copy
> >the file from master RE to backup RE but it
> > takes for ever - more than half h
18 matches
Mail list logo
