The 'show virtual-chassis' output on an EX4500 shows the following columns:
> show virtual-chassis
Virtual Chassis ID: 0fff.78ff.dbffVirtual Chassis Mode: Enabled
Mstr Mixed Neighbor ListMember ID Status
Serial NoModel prio Role
All,
Some time ago, I asked whether this was possible. tl;dr - it is, and
mostly works with a few caveats.
The config I used was basically the same as that in the "Configuring
Stateful NAT64 for Handling IPv4 Address Depletion" document from
Juniper, but with one important change (that docu
On 29/11/11 14:37, Eric Van Tol wrote:
Basic question - I'm assuming that you have "cluster x.x.x.x"
configured under the BGP group or individual BGP neighbor? This is
the only reason I could see this occurring, is if you were missing
the cluster statement, or it was being overridden by somethi
> -Original Message-
> From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
> boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers
> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 7:38 AM
> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [j-nsp] Does a L3VPN RR require routing-instance for each
> VRF?
Including the bgp config would help too.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
On 29/11/11 14:46, Per Granath wrote:
If you are doing route target filtering (family route-target), then you may
need to add the default target on the RRs:
set ... protocols bgp ... family route-target advertise-default
We are not doing route target filtering.
I think I need to re-state my
Hi,
we had this problem. We opened a ticket at Juniper and found our case here in
this list. We are not amused. Is this the default, that Juniper support
contacts an official mailing list??
However, I would like to ask the experts here for a continuing problem. Please
let me know, if it is bet
If you are doing route target filtering (family route-target), then you may
need to add the default target on the RRs:
set ... protocols bgp ... family route-target advertise-default
Cheers.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
htt
You don't need to define any VRFs. I'll post a config later.
You don't need static routes for each PE either, you can just have a default
route to discard in inet.3 and it'll work.
Derick Winkworth
CCIE #15672 (RS, SP), JNCIE-M #721
http://packetpushers.net/author/dwinkworth/
_
On 29/11/11 12:55, Keegan Holley wrote:
Do you have family inet-VPN configured in the group stanza? All the
Yes.
I also have routes in the "inet.3" table matching the next-hops (to
reply to the many people who unicasted me off-list). I have tried both a
static and LDP.
routes are reflecte
Do you have family inet-VPN configured in the group stanza? All the routes are
reflected from the bgp.l3vpn.0 table. You don't have to define each vrf. If you
already configured the address family it sounds like it doesn't like your ext.
communities for some reason.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov
As per subject line: if we want to use a JunOS box (M7i, running 10.4)
as a route-reflector, it seems to reject inet-vpn routes with:
bgp_rcv_nlri: 129.x.x.0:4:193.x.x.0/92 rejected due to the lack of a
valid target community
I was hoping we could avoid the hassle of defining the VRF on the R
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:59:14AM +0400, Tima Maryin wrote:
>
> RIPE NCC was awared about this issue and now reallocate blocks to those
> who got addrs from 128.0.0.0/16
One more update on this topic: RIPE started debogonisation for
128.0.0.0/16, so it looks like this network will be allocated
Hi Gokhan,
For me, one of the benefits I can see is that it will help you to
collect most of the logs you need on the exact time that a problem
happens.
For example, in case some FPC has got problem. When that happens the
JUNOS will raise one event and that event will trigger a junos script
(inst
Dear Diogo,
Service Now..
We have demo version without additional features.
Honestly, i do not see any beneficial point inside of it.
Am i missing something ?
Thanks and regards,
Gokhan
2011/11/28 Diogo Montagner
> Hi Gokhan,
>
> Which application of Junos Space are you referring ?
>
> For ex
15 matches
Mail list logo
