Re: [j-nsp] proxy arp C vs J

Try the command: no-gratuitous-arp-request > > Basically we migrate from a Cisco to a Juniper MX80, and since there > > has been some issues, mainly we are seeing IP addresses being shared > > by 2-3 mac address, to be precise , mac address being rewritten , ie: > > one IP is being seen on the Ju

Re: [j-nsp] Junos-RSVP-TE_nested_paths_RFC4206

Hi, Please share the configuration... BR// On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Victor Lyapunov wrote: > Hello All > > I have been trying to perform a simple to test for RSVP-TE testing > according to RFC4206. Specifically my test topology is the following > > PE1<=>CORE1<=>CORE2<=>CORE3<=>R2 > > Al

[j-nsp] Junos-RSVP-TE_nested_paths_RFC4206

Hello All I have been trying to perform a simple to test for RSVP-TE testing according to RFC4206. Specifically my test topology is the following PE1<=>CORE1<=>CORE2<=>CORE3<=>R2 All routers belong to the same ISIS area - I install an MPLS-TE path spanning between CORE1, CORE2. - I have not fou

Re: [j-nsp] proxy arp C vs J

Forgot to add we are running MX80 on Junos 11.2 On 6 February 2012 19:56, biwa net wrote: > Hi Guys > We are experiencing some issues in one of our client sites, > > Basically we migrate from a Cisco to a Juniper MX80, and since there has > been some issues, mainly we are seeing IP addresses be

[j-nsp] proxy arp C vs J

Hi Guys We are experiencing some issues in one of our client sites, Basically we migrate from a Cisco to a Juniper MX80, and since there has been some issues, mainly we are seeing IP addresses being shared by 2-3 mac address, to be precise , mac address being rewritten , ie: one IP is being seen