On 7/03/2012 10:53 AM, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
interface ae0 {
unit 40 {
family inet {
address ...;
}
}
unit 50 {
mac-address 02:02:02:04:04:04; /* different MAC for this unit */
family inet {
address ...;
}
}
}
This worked fine for me in 9.3/9.
I've received 6 24 ports all had 11.4r1 and 2x 48 ports which has 10.4r
something
That is in the Asia/Pacific area
It would be nice if they shipped with Junipers recommended version
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.n
I am resurrecting this old thread because we are still receiving new
EX4200s from the distribution channel with Junos 11.2R1.2 on them. This
version is so unstable on the 4200 it is pathetic. Juniper guys, please
talk to whoever in the company decides what software ships on new products,
and make
I have a somewhat unusual network topology where it would really benefit me
to be able to change the MAC address used on a given AE interface logical
unit. This does not seem possible in 10.4 on the MX series. Is it
available in any later release? For example, I wish to configure:
interface ae0
Hello,
Would folks be willing to share their MPLS Core QoS model? We use "R" cards for
Core links leaving us with 8 Forwarding Classes (FC) & 8 Queues (1-1
relationship). We decouple the services from the FC. There's only 8 FC so each
service can't get dedicated FCs. We dedicate the NC FC for t
Switching with a pair of 240s (and 650s) is supported in 11.1R3 and
later, but it does not work with the smaller branch boxes. You need (at
least) one extra cable between the boxes dedicated to switch traffic.
Have not tried it myself, but it is in the release notes.
Is this extra cable b/t the
On 06/03/2012, at 7:38 PM, Jose María Carrera wrote:
> hello there
>
> Is there anyway to tear down the interface when the interface included in the
> VPLS is not directly connected to the CE, but to one switch in between?
> If the setup is as follows
>
> PE--SW--CE
>
> If the interfa
Hi David,
> Just curious about your experiences with the SRX J-Web GUI.
Woeful, just like everyone else's. You've got to wonder whether the monumental
failure that the SRX GUI is, is one of the major reasons why the SSG Product
line is still available.
> We have been testing the SRX-210 for a
hello there
Is there anyway to tear down the interface when the interface included in the
VPLS is not directly connected to the CE, but to one switch in between?
If the setup is as follows
PE--SW--CE
If the interface between SW and CE goes down, the interface between PE and SW
is still
Hi Isidoro,
I guess the RE is hot insert-able. You just need to be sure that the JUNOS
version on both the RE should be same (if you intend to run GRES and NSR). But
to be safe you should do it in a maintenance window.
The primary RE (1st) should be in slot 0 and backup RE (2nd) should be in s
6 mar 2012 kl. 02:20 skrev TCIS List Acct:
> Thanks for all of the responses.
>
> A few more questions:
>
> - Can the L2 switch "feature" on the SRX240 be used when I have a pair of
> appliances in HA mode? The docs seem to be conflicting on this -- it appears
> that it may be supported in
11 matches
Mail list logo
