Hi Pavel, some corrections inline.
Ciao
Magno
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Pavel Lunin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Until Juniper realizes MS-MIC (I have no idea when it will happen) MX5–80
> boxes really supports no NAT at all.
>
[MAGNO] Not dynamic NAT (or PBA), just static 1:1 nat
>
> What they cal
Model: mx80
JUNOS Base OS boot [11.2R4.3]
It is indeed an MX80, but running 11.2R4.3
and I have more than just jl2tpd having issues.
Apr 11 18:34:50 HOST-PE01 init: can not access /usr/sbin/jl2tpd: No such
file or directory
Apr 11 18:34:50 HOST-PE01 init: can not access /usr/sbin/relayd: No su
Hi,
has anyone ever tried using bulk configured interfaces with ICR (inter chassis
redundancy) in JunosE.
The bulk config and the ICR config bits alone seem to work, but once its put
together, it breaks: the PPPoE session is terminated before it gets to
authenticate the user. 'show vlan subint
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Skeeve Stevens
wrote:
>
> Hey everyone.
>
> We're using the JUNOScript method to provision services on our MX80's.
>
> We have an issue where a bunch of processes seem to be having issues.
>
> Does anything below look familiar to anyone?
>
> I am concerned by the f
Hey everyone.
We're using the JUNOScript method to provision services on our MX80's.
We have an issue where a bunch of processes seem to be having issues.
Does anything below look familiar to anyone?
I am concerned by the following mostly:
init: ddos-service
the No such file or directory's
Af
On 4/16/2012 4:35 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 04/15/2012 09:01 AM, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:17:51PM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 13/04/12 16:11, Jose Madrid wrote:
Why not just use "monitor interface"? I have used it in the past
and its a
tcp-dump like output.
That jus
Hi,
I have configured captive portal on EX4200 switch and users are authenticated
using radius server. how can I specify speed for each user using radius
attributes or any other way.
Regards.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
h
On 04/15/2012 09:01 AM, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:17:51PM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 13/04/12 16:11, Jose Madrid wrote:
Why not just use "monitor interface"? I have used it in the past and its a
tcp-dump like output.
That just shows control-plane packets.
And only t
8 matches
Mail list logo