Re: [j-nsp] redistributing label between rsvp and ldp

Hi Keegan, Thanks for your reply and explaining all the caveats of mpls signaling protocols. First of all, I am not gonna use this kind of setup in real environment. I am doing all of this in order to learn how to integrate two different labeling protocols in various circumstances. I don't wan

Re: [j-nsp] EX3200 vs. EX4200 MPLS

Yes they do, but it requires an Advanced Feature License. They provide - CCC only (not EoMPLS/L2Circuit). On 30/04/2012, at 1:06 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote: > Hey guys, > > I've tried googling and my foo is weak today. > > I am trying to confirm that the EX3200 and EX4200 have the same MPLS > c

Re: [j-nsp] EX3200 vs. EX4200 MPLS

I have yet to run into any limit. There probably is one, but would need to Lab it up and try to max it out. I've heard of people using EX3200/4200s as a pure MPLS CCC endpoint device (i.e. 1 LSP per physical port) as some kind of wacky olde-style "M13 Mux" like we used to do in the TDM days; s

[j-nsp] Bulk Provisioning Question

Hey all, We have a client who is using MX80s in front of a Vmware Cluster. They are using the XML provisioning API to manage the provisioning on VLAN's, Layer 3 and Layer 2 services. Not that important what is being provisioned though. The issue is they want to be able to rapidly provision with

Re: [j-nsp] EX3200 vs. EX4200 MPLS

Chris/Ben, How would I go about finding how how many CCC the EX3200/4200 can support? ...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens, CEO* eintellego Pty Ltd ske...@eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954 Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skee

Re: [j-nsp] EX3200 vs. EX4200 MPLS

Yup. The EX3200 is basically an EX4200 minus the VC capability (and one less PFE from what I remember for the uplink ports/expansion thingy). Same single-label RSVP-style CCC's w/Optional QoS/Pbit inspection and EXP remarking. (Kompella style). No Martini/LDP though. *Officially Requires the

[j-nsp] EX3200 vs. EX4200 MPLS

Hey guys, I've tried googling and my foo is weak today. I am trying to confirm that the EX3200 and EX4200 have the same MPLS capabilities. Specifically around pseudo-wires (I think the term is). *Skeeve Stevens, CEO* eintellego Pty Ltd ske...@eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net

Re: [j-nsp] redistributing label between rsvp and ldp

Labels aren't like routes per se. They only point to a next hop and not a destination so you don't have to exchange labels between two routing protocols in the same way you would routes. You only have to configure the routers at the edge of each topology so that it runs both protocols. That bein

Re: [j-nsp] EX4500 - 3rd party DAC/Twinax cable support - link-up at 1g instead of 10g

On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Tore Anderson wrote: > * Dale Shaw > >> I have a customer that is trying to connect some ESX hosts at 10g to a >> recently commissioned EX4500 VC. >> >> Their ESX hosts are IBM servers, and they were supplied with the >> following DAC cables: >> >> Cable: IBM Twin-

Re: [j-nsp] EX4500 - 3rd party DAC/Twinax cable support - link-up at 1g instead of 10g

* Dale Shaw > I have a customer that is trying to connect some ESX hosts at 10g to a > recently commissioned EX4500 VC. > > Their ESX hosts are IBM servers, and they were supplied with the > following DAC cables: > > Cable: IBM Twin-ax Active Cable 5M, PN: 45W3039 > Cable labelled as: Brocade 10

Re: [j-nsp] redistributing label between rsvp and ldp

Hi Andrew, You should consider using 'labeld-BGP'. Look at this example: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12.1/topics/example/vpn-interprovider-vpn-example-multihop-mp-ebgp-with-p-routers.html HTH, On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 09:52, Uzi Be wrote: > > hi - > yeah p3 and p4 support both l