Re: [j-nsp] MX80 poor monitoring, packet loss to RE, SNMP not responding

2012-07-19 Thread Atif Saleem
Hi David, Do you have any firewall filter to protect RE or doing any policing of the traffic destined to RE? If, you have the filter, is it applied to loopback interface lo0.0? You need to check whether it is configured properly or applied properly or not. Best, Atif Saleem On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 a

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 poor monitoring, packet loss to RE, SNMP not responding

2012-07-19 Thread David Miller
On 7/19/2012 5:56 PM, Morgan McLean wrote: > So I actually don't use the FXP interface. I basically have four OSPF > connections coming into my edge firewall srx cluster, and I use the > loopback address advertised over OSPF to manage all of my devices. The > MX80's are the only ones that seem to h

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 poor monitoring, packet loss to RE, SNMP not responding

2012-07-19 Thread Morgan McLean
So I actually don't use the FXP interface. I basically have four OSPF connections coming into my edge firewall srx cluster, and I use the loopback address advertised over OSPF to manage all of my devices. The MX80's are the only ones that seem to have a problem...am I S.O.L if I'm not using the FXP

Re: [j-nsp] RE : route BGP stall bug

2012-07-19 Thread Tim Vollebregt
Hi, I have 11 groups configured, mostly eBGP. No alert messages. Also not sure if we are hitting PR722890, as we don't see the error in our logs: Cannot perform nh operation DELETE nhop (null) type unicast index 717 errno 1 As RAS confirmed the bug is still there, I'll have to work on getting

Re: [j-nsp] Fwd: mx480 to mx240 port channel ae

2012-07-19 Thread Alex Arseniev
What JUNOS version and linecard HW? "interface-mode trunk" is supported on Trio starting from 11.1. Thanks Alex - Original Message - From: "Mohammad Khalil" To: Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 6:48 AM Subject: [j-nsp] Fwd: mx480 to mx240 port channel ae -- Forwarded message