Hi Group-
I'm looking to see what others are using in EX switches for SFP's and SFP+'s.
Are most using Juniper optics, or some 3rd party. If some 3rd party, what
brand are you having the best luck with.
Any input would be greatly appreciated.
___
j
On Jul 24, 2012, at 2:04 PM, Wayne Tucker wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Aaron Dewell wrote:
>> Yes, Type Transit (2). However, the Network LSA only includes 3 attached
>> routers (should be 6 currently). There are two Network LSAs in R7. One has
>> the interface IP of R1 (non-DR
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Aaron Dewell wrote:
> Yes, Type Transit (2). However, the Network LSA only includes 3 attached
> routers (should be 6 currently). There are two Network LSAs in R7. One has
> the interface IP of R1 (non-DR/BDR) with 3 attached routers (R1, R5, R6).
> The oth
On Jul 24, 2012, at 4:56 AM, Wayne Tucker wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Aaron Dewell wrote:
>> I ran into an odd behavior here tonight, I'm hoping someone has some ideas.
>> We have 8 routers on a broadcast OSPF segment. All are advertising their
>> loopback addresses (amongst o
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Dale Shaw wrote:
> - Is there a 'best practice' for CoS config (scheduler-map, mainly)
> for analyser output interfaces? I don't really want any fancy queueing
> on these ports.
I'd say it depends on what else you're doing with CoS on that switch,
though I think I
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Aaron Dewell wrote:
> I ran into an odd behavior here tonight, I'm hoping someone has some ideas.
> We have 8 routers on a broadcast OSPF segment. All are advertising their
> loopback addresses (amongst other things). I'll call this R1 to R8 for now.
> Thei
Hi all,
Has anyone found a solid config for EX-series analyser output
interfaces to reduce the likelihood of drops?
We have a bunch of network performance probes attached to our network
and slowly but surely I'm fine-tuning the EX interface and analyser
configs in an attempt to eliminate unnecess
Am 24.07.2012 07:21, schrieb Antti Ristimäki:
> On 2012-07-23 16:22, Tobias Heister wrote:
>> The document about scaling with labeled bgp [2] has a section about 6PE but
>> it does not help much. First of all the method explained to get interface
>> routes to inet6.3 does not work (at
>> least on
8 matches
Mail list logo