On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Michel de Nostredame
wrote:
> Good day,
>
> I am recently working on an replacement of aged M10i; we are using
> M10i to terminate multiple 100mbps/1gbps Metro-Ethernet from branch
> buildings (FEs are aggregated on EX4200 and Layer2 uplink to M10i by
> GE), hence
Hi All,
We are trying to implement iBGP multipath.
R1 receives route 2.2.2.2 from R2 with NH=1.1.1.1
1.1.1.1 is an iBGP route learned through 2 iBGP peers (all attributes are
equal).
For 1.1.1.1 we can see two next-hops at both the RIB and FIB.
For 2.2.2.2 only 1 next hop is installed at both RIB
Dear All,
I have L2VPN between two PEs and I am using LT interfaces on logical
systems. Looks like the control plain operations are working
correctly,however, the forwarding plain doesn't seem to work. It could be
a bug or limitation of the LT interfaces. I will be glad if you can verify
that for
Hi Ivan
Yes I understood the part for the domain-tag and also realized the
issue with instance-type for the routing-instance but unfortunately
since this was an existing network running over there I could not
change it back to virtual-router.
Regards
Varma
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Ivan I
On 2012-07-24 10:34, Tobias Heister wrote:
Am 24.07.2012 07:21, schrieb Antti Ristimäki:
On 2012-07-23 16:22, Tobias Heister wrote:
The document about scaling with labeled bgp [2] has a section about 6PE but it
does not help much. First of all the method explained to get interface routes
to i
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:41:56AM +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 01:32:50AM -0700, Morgan McLean wrote:
> > So I have a single ASN and two sites that do not peer directly with each
> > other, but have eBGP with providers.
> >
> > Site A takes full routes, advertises a /24
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 01:32:50AM -0700, Morgan McLean wrote:
> > So I have a single ASN and two sites that do not peer directly with
> > each other, but have eBGP with providers.
> >
> > Site A takes full routes, advertises a /24 Site B takes defaults only,
> > advertises a /24
> >
> > I notice
On (2012-07-25 09:08 +0200), Daniel Roesen wrote:
> As discussed "offline", not when OSPF implementations follow OSPFv2 spec
> from 1998, (the still current) RFC2328. I'm not aware that widely used
> implementations behave different and am too lazy to lab that. :)
Just tried in 11.4R3 and 'overlo
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 01:50:37AM -0700, Morgan McLean wrote:
> I'll test with it in my lab, I read about this but wasn't sure it was a
> good idea. Site A has two routers, so wouldn't I receive the routes being
> advertised from R1 > level 3 > R2?
Depends on the very specific setup, wether R1+R2
Hi,
Yes, this is because the 'domain-vpn-tag 0'. The other thing that it is
doing is to zeroes the tag.
What type of routing-instance you are using on the CE? To not have the
check on the CE you can use 'routing-instance type virtual-router' instead
of 'routing-instance type vrf'
Then you will n
I'll test with it in my lab, I read about this but wasn't sure it was a
good idea. Site A has two routers, so wouldn't I receive the routes being
advertised from R1 > level 3 > R2?
Morgan
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 01:32:50AM -0700, Morgan Mc
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 01:32:50AM -0700, Morgan McLean wrote:
> So I have a single ASN and two sites that do not peer directly with each
> other, but have eBGP with providers.
>
> Site A takes full routes, advertises a /24
> Site B takes defaults only, advertises a /24
>
> I notice I do not get
So I have a single ASN and two sites that do not peer directly with each
other, but have eBGP with providers.
Site A takes full routes, advertises a /24
Site B takes defaults only, advertises a /24
I notice I do not get the route advertised at site B by any of my providers
at site A. Is this due
Hi Ivan
I could not get the manual loop prevention thing working as whenever I
tried to set any tag while redistributing mp-ibgp to OSPF and then
match the same on other PE while importing into OSPF it did not work.
I was not able to see any tag being set.
However I have found a fix for this solu
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:07:51PM +0300, Saku Ytti wrote:
> > To cut Cisco some slack, OSPF has no simple overload bit, so you have to
> > raise your link metrics all the way for a somewhat crude and limited
> > emulation of IS-IS' overload bit. There are still possible setups where
>
> 'max-metr
15 matches
Mail list logo
