Re: [j-nsp] ASR9001 vs MX80

Please note there's also the MX5 through MX40 that can be upgraded via a license to a full MX80 as well. On 8/7/12 1:56 AM, "Tima Maryin" wrote: >Hi, > >have a look at: >https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2012-May/023303.html > > >and the whole thread: >https://puck.nether.net/piperm

[j-nsp] Importing interface routes into routing instances

Hi, I'm using routing-instances and filter-based forwarding in order to emulate policy-based VPN while actually using route-based VPNs on a SRX cluster (I cannot use actual policy-based VPN due to the limitations described in KB21363 and KB23082). I'm using a commit script to build the neces

Re: [j-nsp] ASR9001 vs MX80

Hi, have a look at: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2012-May/023303.html and the whole thread: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2012-April/023068.html They are about mx480 vs ASR9006, but most of stuff still applies. On 07.08.2012 10:22, William Jackson wrote: H