The MX can do this several different ways:
1) VPLS MH - it's a O(n) convergence problem, where n is the number of
VPLS instances
2) MC-LAG A/S - now becomes a O(1) convergence problem
On 10/29/12 4:19 PM, "Luca Salvatore" wrote:
>Hi Guys,
>
>I have a question regarding dual VPLS links. My top
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Luca Salvatore wrote:
> Right. So BGP needs to be full meshed also for this to work right?
Yes -- assuming you're using BGP for signaling.
Since BGP is used to signal where the PE/edge ports are, once it comes
time to use that to establish LSPs, the routers just
Right. So BGP needs to be full meshed also for this to work right?
Luca
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ben Dale
Sent: Tuesday, 30 October 2012 12:22 PM
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net nsp
Subject:
> My topology is a bit different though... There is no 'service provider' cloud
> between my MX routers.
> They are directly connected via dark fibre. Does the split horizon rule come
> into play here?
It does - although the physical topology looks like a ring, remember that it
will be all L3
Thanks for the links.
As I mentioned to Chip - my MX routers will be directly connected via fibre.
Do the rules still apply for this type of topology?
Luca
-Original Message-
From: Ben Dale [mailto:bd...@comlinx.com.au]
Sent: Tuesday, 30 October 2012 11:17 AM
To: Luca Salvatore
Cc: juni
My topology is a bit different though... There is no 'service provider' cloud
between my MX routers.
They are directly connected via dark fibre. Does the split horizon rule come
into play here?
Luca
-Original Message-
From: chip [mailto:chip.g...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 30 October 2
Hi Luca,
> MX1-darkfibre--MX2
> | |
> | |
> MX3-darkfibre--MX4
>
> So above you see that there are dual links which will create a loop.
>
> How doe
In VPLS, loop avoidance is arranged by the following rule: A PE never
forwards a frame received from a PE, to another PE. The use of a full
mesh combined with split horizon forwarding guarantees a loop-free
broadcast domain.
From: wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_Private_LAN_Service#
Hi Guys,
I have a question regarding dual VPLS links. My topology will look like this:
MX1-darkfibre--MX2
| |
| |
MX3-darkfibre--MX4
So above you
So, I'm working on tuning an SRX deployment and am wondering if
something is possible.
This deployment is doing a lot of source NAT for a wide variety of
endpoints as they egress out to the Internet. Pretty vanilla
configuration.
Specific sources are mapped via NAT rules to specific egress IPs (fo
>From 12.1R1 it should work.
http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB26116
>
> Any Ideas on using a USB 3/4G modem with the SRX 100 ?
>
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinf
11 matches
Mail list logo
