Thanks Jeff-
> > Do you see an issue with blowing up ex4200s with all this ospf and vrrp?
> > I'm
> labbing tomorrow and will try to get the boxes to thrash.
>
> I'm interested to know your thoughts on RE performance after you have
> labbed this scenario. I've read the EX4200 supports 256 VRF-
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Ryan Goldberg wrote:
> Do you see an issue with blowing up ex4200s with all this ospf and vrrp? I'm
> labbing tomorrow and will try to get the boxes to thrash.
I'm interested to know your thoughts on RE performance after you have
labbed this scenario. I've read
Thanks Benny.
> > DMVPN boxes (cisco x8xx), and MPLS boxes (MX80s). All those L3
> > addresses are in customer-specific routing-instance (or, VRF on cisco)
> > and there's a per-customer ospf instance keeping things knitted
> > together.
> That design is somewhat similar to one that I am familiar
After the last site maintenance my support account was completely foo. I had to
have them reset it for me.
On Dec 3, 2012, at 8:13 PM, Julien Goodwin
wrote:
> On 04/12/12 02:28, Phil Mayers wrote:
>> On 03/12/12 14:45, Jason Fortier wrote:
>>> The "export" junos does not support SSH and HTTPS
On 04/12/12 02:28, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 03/12/12 14:45, Jason Fortier wrote:
>> The "export" junos does not support SSH and HTTPS. Only the "Domestic"
>> seems to.
>
> Correct.
>
> Interestingly, I recently seem to have lost access to download
> "domestic" JunOS for J-series, which I did pre
You have NTP enabled, and it's properly synced?
- CK.
On 2012-12-04, at 4:28 AM, Ali Sumsam wrote:
> The Experts Who The Experts Call
> Juniper - Cisco – Brocade - IBM
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/
instead
set interfaces ge-1/1/1 unit 24 family inet sampling input
try applying the below filter on inbound and outbound direction of
interface ge-1/1/1.24
filter sample {
term 1 {
then {
sample;
accept;
}
}
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:41 PM, OBrie
you should probably define the source ip address from the router.
On Dec 3, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Ali Sumsam wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am moving from Cisco to Juniper MX5. My Cisco router was sending netflow
> information to a server(NFSEN).
> I cant see any update on the same server from my MX5 router,
Hi All,
I am moving from Cisco to Juniper MX5. My Cisco router was sending netflow
information to a server(NFSEN).
I cant see any update on the same server from my MX5 router, after we have
done the migration. Following are the Cisco and Juniper configs.
Cisco:
ip flow-export version 5 origin-as
On 03/12/12 14:45, Jason Fortier wrote:
The "export" junos does not support SSH and HTTPS. Only the "Domestic"
seems to.
Correct.
Interestingly, I recently seem to have lost access to download
"domestic" JunOS for J-series, which I did previously have.
I have retained "domestic" download
The "export" junos does not support SSH and HTTPS. Only the "Domestic"
seems to.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Hi Experts,
Currently I have following scenario.
SRX650 Cluster -> Nortel Router -> SRX240 (remote site)
The nortel router has E1 terminating from the remote SRX240 firewalls. The
objective is to remove the Nortel router from the network and terminate the
E1 directly on the primary SRX 650. For t
Ah there it is!
Don't i feel silly.
Thank you
From: Chris Kawchuk [juniperd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 3 December 2012 6:21 PM
To: Luca Salvatore
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] export OSPF routes as type 1
> I'm trying to export so
Perhaps these are useful:
http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB25094
http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB24566
> Does the SRX do something "special" with asymmetric UDP flows? When I
> say UDP I mean UDP generically, because I'm aware of special cases lik
On 12/03/2012 03:48 AM, Dale Shaw wrote:
Sometimes (due to OSPF's route selection process when presented with
equal cost routes) the path traffic takes from "A" to "B" is not the
same as the path from "B" to "A" -- the intermediate device to
hair-pin on (for A->B and B->A) is different. In perfo
15 matches
Mail list logo
