Hi Luca,
_I think_ the stats that show for inbound rate (65M-70M) on the interface
maybe the one before you do policing. It may not be the rate after
dropping. On the other hand traffic shown outbound already subject of your
outbound policy.
Could you check the traffic that leaves the router (e.g
Does that make a difference? I have the same bandwidth requirments in and
out...
From: OBrien, Will [obri...@missouri.edu]
Sent: Saturday, 26 January 2013 8:38 AM
To: Luca Salvatore
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Burst size for polic
Does anybody know how an MX (Trio) hitting MQ-Chip memory bandwidth
limitations will report the drops? I've got a couple of boxes reporting
fabric drops in "show pfe statistics traffic" and "show class-of-service
fabric statistics" (though of course the two numbers aren't even close
to the same
I usually use separate policers for in and out.
Will
On Jan 25, 2013, at 1:22 PM, "Luca Salvatore" wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Got some issues with my policing configuation on a SRX650.
> I have it configured to police inbound and outbound traffic to 40Mb.
>
> The config to make this happen is:
>
Hi Guys,
Got some issues with my policing configuation on a SRX650.
I have it configured to police inbound and outbound traffic to 40Mb.
The config to make this happen is:
configuration firewall policer police-customer | display set
set firewall policer police-customer if-exceeding bandwidth-lim
Greetings all,
Two questions.any input is greatly appreciated -
1. According to Juniper MX series book, "a bridge domain will look at
all of the IFL's in the bridge domain that specifies the routing-interface
of the irb." I've had two separate incidences where a physically down
interf
Hi,
It seems that ifq tail drops don't increment IF-MIB::ifOutDiscards
counter, whereas e.g. packets dropped by RED do. Has anyone else
encountered this and is this an expected behaviour or a known issue?
-Antti
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@
7 matches
Mail list logo
