My appologies, it is actually the INPUT filter which is not working correctly.
If i run speedtest.net it is the upload speed which goes much higher than the
40Mb policer. Uploading means Input filter.
I will see if I can find another way to test
Luca
-Original Message-
From: Huan Pham
Hmm, if you can show / monitor interface on your FW during the peak time, that
would give you the actual speed customer gets.
Alternatively, can you try downloading or uploading a big file and see what is
the speed customer gets?
The above methods are more realistic.
Speedtest is performed in
It is dropping packets yes, but my external speedtests show speeds at 70Mb.
I'm not using any show commands to verify this, it is all external tests.
Luca
-Original Message-
From: Huan Pham [mailto:drie.huanp...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 29 January 2013 7:49 AM
To: Luca Salvatore
Cc: ju
https://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos11.4/information-products/topic-collections/release-notes/11.4/topic-62949.html#jd0e5448
License support to enhance port capacity of MX5, MX10, and MX40 routers-By
installing additional licenses, you can enhance the port capacity of your
router withou
show chassis fcp, see if they came online.
On Jan 28, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Dave Peters - Terabit Systems wrote:
> Hi all-
>
> I've got two MX80s that I upgraded from 11.1R1.14 to 11.4R6.5, and after I
> finished, one unit showed the physical ports no longer available via the CLI.
> The xe-x/x/x
I am sure your policer is dropping traffic, and you can see the number of drops
via:
"show policer".
You may be able to work out roughly the rate of dropping based on the change in
this number.
On 29/01/2013, at 7:43 AM, Huan Pham wrote:
>
> I am sure your policer is dropping traffic, a
Hi Luca,
What I meant is that the input policing (applied on your LAN interface) is
working per design, even if you see traffic rate on your LAN interface in the
inbound direction higher than what you set.
The rate you see (via show interface extensive, or monitor interface) is the
rate BEFOR
Hi all-
I've got two MX80s that I upgraded from 11.1R1.14 to 11.4R6.5, and after I
finished, one unit showed the physical ports no longer available via the CLI.
The xe-x/x/x interfaces are configurable on one unit, but don't show up at all
on the other.
This seems like a simple problem, but I
The firewall where this is configured has hundereds of customer interfaces on
them
I can't apply a policer to the WAN interface as that will police the entier
link (300Mb) down to a slow speed. I need to police each customer to 40Mb on
their own interface.
As its just the outbound policer that
That is known issue. and very irritating issue for me. Please make sure
that your SE knows that you are not happy with that. Maybe some time in the
future, J will fix it.
Nick
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Antti Ristimäki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems that ifq tail drops don't increment IF-MIB::
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:50:06AM +0200, Saku Ytti wrote:
> I've seen at least twice now issues on XFP where temperature starts to draw
> weird saw-tooth, like this http://ytti.fi/ddm2.png
About the same issue here: http://snar.spb.ru/xe.png.
Differences between our and your cases:
- we observ
Thanks to Steinar, Alexandre and 3rd person in other media the problem is
bit clearer now.
I incorrectly stated I've seen this in other vendor too. Now when I double
checked my data, I realized the location where I thought it affected other
vendor I was looking at wrong end.
The other location wa
> I've seen at least twice now issues on XFP where temperature starts to draw
> weird saw-tooth, like this http://ytti.fi/ddm2.png
We've seen this too.
> Obviously I'm not running JNPR optic, but the two optics I've seen, have
> been from different vendors, who are not using same source. I think
13 matches
Mail list logo
