Are these dedicated RR's or are they combined RR/PE devices?
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Doug Hanks
Sent: Wednesday, 6 February 2013 2:02 PM
To: Ali Sumsam;
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] RR cluster
vanilla
vanilla ibgp between the RRs would work
On 2/5/13 6:36 PM, "Ali Sumsam" wrote:
>Hi All,
>I want to configure two RRs in my network.
>What should be the relation between two of them?
>I want them to send updates to each other and to the RR-Clients.
>
>Regards,
>*Ali Sumsam CCIE*
>*Network Engine
Hi All,
I want to configure two RRs in my network.
What should be the relation between two of them?
I want them to send updates to each other and to the RR-Clients.
Regards,
*Ali Sumsam CCIE*
*Network Engineer - Level 3*
eintellego Pty Ltd
a...@eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net
Phone: 1300 753
Hi
Is it possible to log to syslog events where optics has low-alarm on
temperature ?
Eg.
admin@lab> show interfaces diagnostics optics xe-1/0/0 | match On
Module temperature low alarm : On
Module temperature low warning: On
My current syslog host configuratio
The table-lable bit is the one time I am aware of that the forwarding
class is changed in the middle without the system being specifically
setup to do so.
Assuming that you have mpls and ipv4 classifiers on all interfaces.
Incoming is classified on the label, label pop, outgoing is transmitted
What did help was:
set services rpm probe test test test thresholds total-loss <1-15>
The command is not required on EX/M/MX, and I don't know whether this
is a bug or the expected behavior on SRXs.
Regards,
Vladi
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Vladislav A. VASILEV <
vladislavavasi...@gmail.
On (2013-02-05 11:30 +0100), Daniel Roesen wrote:
> > Classification on EXP may be more accurate: as there are no "payload
> > type" field in MPLS header, this router just can't know that packet's
> > content is IPv4).
>
> MPCs (Trio) uses a heuristic to determine MPLS payload for
> load-balanci
Hi all,
I have the following RPM configured on an SRX device:
root# run show configuration services
rpm {
probe test {
test test {
probe-type icmp-ping;
target address 10.0.0.2;
test-interval 5;
}
}
}
It's obvious that the probe is fail
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 01:31:14PM +0400, Alexandre Snarskii wrote:
> PHP router:
>
> 604050 *[LDP/9] 4d 00:37:22, metric 1
> > to AA.BBB.233.13 via ae4.9, Pop
> 604050(S=0)*[LDP/9] 4d 00:37:22, metric 1
> > to AA.BBB.233.13 via ae
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 09:36:10AM -0900, Christopher E. Brown wrote:
>
> The packet is classified on input.
>
> *UNLESS* you use table-label in a l3vpn, then it gets re-classified
> after the label POP.
Intresting. However, my question is not about l3vpn, it is about plain
old IPv4 packet with
10 matches
Mail list logo
