On 25/03/2013, at 12:33 PM, Skeeve Stevens
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've heard quite a few people have self-upgraded their SRX240's from v1 to
> v2's simply by upgrading the RAM from 1Gb to 2Gb.
>
> Couple of questions.
>
> 1. Any one got a photo of the inside of the SRX240 (can't find any on
No idea what the actual form factor is, as I never got around to opening
the case of the one I had at $JOB[-1], but from the CPU's spec page:
DDR2 up to 800 MHz
1x 72-bit wide
On 25/03/13 13:33, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've heard quite a few people have self-upgraded their SRX240's
Hi Skeeve,
3)
a) The v2 model also has 2GB of internal flash, where as the v1 only
has 1GB. I believe that the flash is soldered on the motherboard.
b) The data sheet now lists 1.8gbit/sec throughput where as the older
datasheet has 1.5gbit/sec. Not sure if this is because of an
What version Junos? I ran into some LLDP bugs on early 11.4 versions.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Riccardo S wrote:
>
>
>
> I’ve a couple of EX in VC configuration
> mode (same Junos) connected with two links in LAG mode and LLDP
> switched-on on the
> aggregate interface.
>
> The problem
Hey all,
I've heard quite a few people have self-upgraded their SRX240's from v1 to
v2's simply by upgrading the RAM from 1Gb to 2Gb.
Couple of questions.
1. Any one got a photo of the inside of the SRX240 (can't find any on
Google)
2. What 'exact' kind of RAM is in the SRX240... slots, sizes,
We had case with vc on 12.2R3
The vc cable didnt forwared traffic in one of the directions
I think it is PSN 2013-03-868
Nitzan
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Tore Anderson wrote:
> * Timh Bergström
>
> > That's interesting, have you seen any other 'gotchas' with 12.2R3? I'm
> > running a 1
On 3/24/13 1:24 PM, Zehef Poto wrote:
Thank you Payam. I think I got what you mean.
In this particular case however, the X/22 route is not a customer or
anything. It is the IXP's peering LAN !
So... It means that the person requested all the IXP's members to
null-route the whole peering LAN ? H
Hey,
I'm not sure what the actual exact request from the user was since i
don't really participate much in the AMS-IX anymore ...
maybe the attack was destined towards their actual nei ip on the
exchange (initially i assumed /22 was their network, sounds like maybe
they meant the /22 that is
On 13-03-24 2:08 PM, Payam Tarverdyan Chychi wrote:
Hey,
I'm not sure what the actual exact request from the user was since i
don't really participate much in the AMS-IX anymore ...
maybe the attack was destined towards their actual nei ip on the
exchange (initially i assumed /22 was their n
Thank you Payam. I think I got what you mean.
In this particular case however, the X/22 route is not a customer or
anything. It is the IXP's peering LAN !
So... It means that the person requested all the IXP's members to
null-route the whole peering LAN ? How can you possibly ask for this ?
I pe
Carry a route is the same as accepting a route and having it become active,
allowing traffic to traverse your network to the destination. In this case the
user is asking you to drop the route (attack traffic) at your edge if possible
and not to carry it through your network and deliver it to the
Hey guys,
Thank you all for the very valuable input. Actually yes, Tobias is right,
I'm having this question because of the (quoted by Tobias) e-mail we got
yesterday across several IXPs.
I just don't understand what is to "carry a route in my backbone". Am I not
supposed to know all of (or most
> Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 11:48:32 +
> From: Peter Tavenier
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 generates power supply and fan alarms when
> environment is good
> Which other problems do 12.3 have with the chassisd process?
I've seen the health-monitoring stuff ignore it's timelimit for traps
Sorry for hijacking!
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Tore Anderson wrote:
> * Marco Nesler
>
>> I need to deploy a small VC with EX4200 switches. For the junos version,
>> usually i just stick with the JTAC recommended one. In this case NSSU and
>> non stop bridging are a requirement, so i need
I got the two PR numbers (PR842933, PR858565) for this issues which will be
fixed in 12.3R2.
Which other problems do 12.3 have with the chassisd process?
Kind regards,
Peter Tavenier
Op 22 mrt. 2013, om 22:09 heeft Giuliano het volgende
geschreven:
> Never mind about 12.3
>
> It has big
Hi All,
Am 24.03.2013 00:26, schrieb Jeff Wheeler:
> Whoever that person is that said something about "use next-hop-self"
> in this context, either you misunderstood them, or you shouldn't
> listen to them anymore. That has nothing to do with looking to see if
> your router knows about a route.
There is some problem with upload diagram, even small, here is link:
http://pokazywarka.pl/mg6gtf/
[url=http://pokazywarka.pl/mg6gtf/]diagram[/url]
W dniu 2013-03-24 11:36, Piotr pisze:
Hi
I attached diagram. I have to connect together two different companies.
They have ethernet leased lines
Hi
I attached diagram. I have to connect together two different companies.
They have ethernet leased lines, so i can use bgp on private AS numbers.
Each have own OSPF. There is max 1k routes in igp. In this moment i use
only ebgp, i removed ibgp. I made redistrubutions ospf-(e)bgp and
(e)bgp-
* Timh Bergström
> That's interesting, have you seen any other 'gotchas' with 12.2R3? I'm
> running a 11.3 version and desperately want NSSU (among other things)
> and have a similar setup, lag/lacp/vlan termination/routing/ospf(v3).
> Does 3rd party transceivers work? How is missing licenses hand
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Zehef Poto wrote:
> I just inherited our backbone. We're a small LIR, we have an AS. The
> backbone consists of four MX80 routers, all acting as eBGP edge ones (there
> are various IP transit links up and running on all of them). I also use
> OSPF adjacencies, and
Hey,
I suggest grabbing a book on routing and ip fundamentals but here is a basic
overview
You get routs, you install routes, you pass routes... So what does this mean?
Every protocol exchanges routes but before it makes them "active" it must run
its specific algorithm to ensure best path is
21 matches
Mail list logo
