On 03/29/2013 12:40 PM, Caillin Bathern wrote:
First try adding "set chassis fpc pic tunnel-services
bandwidth <1g|10G>". You then have tunnel services on the MX80. Can't
remember if this has any caveats on being done to a live system though..
Can someone explain the benefits of using tunne
You should also check for more specific routes inside that block.
Using a filter that specifies x.x.x.x/24 exact to prevent smaller announcements.
I
Will O'Brien
On Mar 29, 2013, at 8:16 AM, "Matthew Crocker" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a weird routing issue where my MX80 is not doing wha
Simplest way is to swap on egress. Under your unit add "output-vlan-map swap".
As long as all your VPLS end points have the same number of tags (sounds like
this do), the S-tag can be different on each end. Output swap will take care of
everything. You could achieve the same thing with pop on in
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Matthew Crocker
wrote:
> Is it possible for the FIB to contain different information than what's
in 'show route'?
> How do I look at whats in the FIB?
Yes, it is possible. Start with user@cli> *show pfe route ip prefix
192.0.2.0/24*
> How do I reset the FIB and
Hello,
I have a weird routing issue where my MX80 is not doing what it is supposed to
do. I have a customer configured with BGP announcing two subnets to me. The
subnets end up in the routing table. One subnet works fine, the other routes
to the wrong machine in my network. Everything l
On 03/29/2013 02:36 PM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
I got an off-list message from Diogo saying that the logical interface
(VLAN ID) on each side must be the same, unless you do some
pop/push/swap magic. Changing that did solve the problem! I still don't
see why though. I only use the VLAN locally o
> I got an off-list message from Diogo saying that the logical interface
> (VLAN ID) on each side must be the same, unless you do some
> pop/push/swap magic. Changing that did solve the problem! I still don't
> see why though. I only use the VLAN locally on each site to separate the
> traffic b
Hi,
I got an off-list message from Diogo saying that the logical interface
(VLAN ID) on each side must be the same, unless you do some
pop/push/swap magic. Changing that did solve the problem! I still don't
see why though. I only use the VLAN locally on each site to separate the
traffic betwe
Hi Mathias,
First try adding "set chassis fpc pic tunnel-services
bandwidth <1g|10G>". You then have tunnel services on the MX80. Can't
remember if this has any caveats on being done to a live system though..
Also check "show route forwarding-table table vpls70134 extensive" to
check for forw
I've just built a new MPLS network consisting of 6 MX5-T routers using
RSVP signaled LSPs where all routers work a combined P/PE routers.
The core network has been running fine for several weeks. L3VPN works fine.
Now I try to establish a VPLS Point-to-Point tunnel between two adjacent
routers
10 matches
Mail list logo