Re: [j-nsp] MX5-T VPLS fowarding problem

2013-03-29 Thread Mathias Sundman
On 03/29/2013 12:40 PM, Caillin Bathern wrote: First try adding "set chassis fpc pic tunnel-services bandwidth <1g|10G>". You then have tunnel services on the MX80. Can't remember if this has any caveats on being done to a live system though.. Can someone explain the benefits of using tunne

Re: [j-nsp] Weird routing issue on my MX80

2013-03-29 Thread OBrien, Will
You should also check for more specific routes inside that block. Using a filter that specifies x.x.x.x/24 exact to prevent smaller announcements. I Will O'Brien On Mar 29, 2013, at 8:16 AM, "Matthew Crocker" wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a weird routing issue where my MX80 is not doing wha

Re: [j-nsp] MX5-T VPLS fowarding problem

2013-03-29 Thread Serge Vautour
Simplest way is to swap on egress. Under your unit add "output-vlan-map swap". As long as all your VPLS end points have the same number of tags (sounds like this do), the S-tag can be different on each end. Output swap will take care of everything. You could achieve the same thing with pop on in

Re: [j-nsp] Weird routing issue on my MX80

2013-03-29 Thread Jeff Wheeler
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Matthew Crocker wrote: > Is it possible for the FIB to contain different information than what's in 'show route'? > How do I look at whats in the FIB? Yes, it is possible. Start with user@cli> *show pfe route ip prefix 192.0.2.0/24* > How do I reset the FIB and

[j-nsp] Weird routing issue on my MX80

2013-03-29 Thread Matthew Crocker
Hello, I have a weird routing issue where my MX80 is not doing what it is supposed to do. I have a customer configured with BGP announcing two subnets to me. The subnets end up in the routing table. One subnet works fine, the other routes to the wrong machine in my network. Everything l

Re: [j-nsp] MX5-T VPLS fowarding problem

2013-03-29 Thread Mathias Sundman
On 03/29/2013 02:36 PM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: I got an off-list message from Diogo saying that the logical interface (VLAN ID) on each side must be the same, unless you do some pop/push/swap magic. Changing that did solve the problem! I still don't see why though. I only use the VLAN locally o

Re: [j-nsp] MX5-T VPLS fowarding problem

2013-03-29 Thread sthaug
> I got an off-list message from Diogo saying that the logical interface > (VLAN ID) on each side must be the same, unless you do some > pop/push/swap magic. Changing that did solve the problem! I still don't > see why though. I only use the VLAN locally on each site to separate the > traffic b

Re: [j-nsp] MX5-T VPLS fowarding problem

2013-03-29 Thread Mathias Sundman
Hi, I got an off-list message from Diogo saying that the logical interface (VLAN ID) on each side must be the same, unless you do some pop/push/swap magic. Changing that did solve the problem! I still don't see why though. I only use the VLAN locally on each site to separate the traffic betwe

Re: [j-nsp] MX5-T VPLS fowarding problem

2013-03-29 Thread Caillin Bathern
Hi Mathias, First try adding "set chassis fpc pic tunnel-services bandwidth <1g|10G>". You then have tunnel services on the MX80. Can't remember if this has any caveats on being done to a live system though.. Also check "show route forwarding-table table vpls70134 extensive" to check for forw

[j-nsp] MX5-T VPLS fowarding problem

2013-03-29 Thread Mathias Sundman
I've just built a new MPLS network consisting of 6 MX5-T routers using RSVP signaled LSPs where all routers work a combined P/PE routers. The core network has been running fine for several weeks. L3VPN works fine. Now I try to establish a VPLS Point-to-Point tunnel between two adjacent routers