Re: [j-nsp] Vlan question MX

2013-07-08 Thread Chris Kawchuk
802.1p QoS Signalling through a Metro-E. May be a switch/switches in-between the customer CPE and the MX. No VID, No P bit. On 09/07/2013, at 8:00 AM, Tom Storey wrote: > If you're plugged in to a router interface on the providers side, why is > there a need to add VLAN tagging on top? Simila

Re: [j-nsp] Vlan question MX

2013-07-08 Thread joel jaeggli
On 7/8/13 3:00 PM, Tom Storey wrote: The thing thats confusing me is, who on earth presents a service to a customer as a tagged service? Ive never come across such a thing. entirely appart from the case of metro-e/pbb/spb if you're doing L2 or L3 vpn, on the PE you can differentiate between tunn

Re: [j-nsp] Vlan question MX

2013-07-08 Thread Ben Dale
On 09/07/2013, at 8:00 AM, Tom Storey wrote: > The thing thats confusing me is, who on earth presents a service to a > customer as a tagged service? Ive never come across such a thing. > > If you're plugged in to a router interface on the providers side, why is > there a need to add VLAN tagging

Re: [j-nsp] Vlan question MX

2013-07-08 Thread Keith
On 7/8/2013 10:26 AM, Keith wrote: Have this setup in the lab on some srx's but want to get some info on this. We have an upstream provider that we use a config: set interfaces ge-0/1/0 vlan-tagging set interfaces ge-0/1/0 encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services set interfaces ge-0/1/0 unit 15

Re: [j-nsp] Vlan question MX

2013-07-08 Thread Tom Storey
The thing thats confusing me is, who on earth presents a service to a customer as a tagged service? Ive never come across such a thing. If you're plugged in to a router interface on the providers side, why is there a need to add VLAN tagging on top? Similarly, if you're plugged in to a switch, nor

Re: [j-nsp] Vlan question MX

2013-07-08 Thread Michael Loftis
vlan-tagging tells JunOS to treat the interface as multiple separate L3 interfaces, identified by VLAN ID. Their end is almost certainly similarly configured (maybe as a MPLS PE) On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Keith wrote: > Have this setup in the lab on some srx's but want to get some info >

Re: [j-nsp] Vlan question MX

2013-07-08 Thread joel jaeggli
On 7/8/13 10:26 AM, Keith wrote: Have this setup in the lab on some srx's but want to get some info on this. We have an upstream provider that we use a config: set interfaces ge-0/1/0 vlan-tagging set interfaces ge-0/1/0 encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services set interfaces ge-0/1/0 unit 1500

Re: [j-nsp] Vlan question MX

2013-07-08 Thread Paul Stewart
Hi KeithŠ Assuming it's on two different interfaces on your side then it doesn't matter (for layer3 interfaces). On their side, it's best to ask them as you want to ensure that the layer2 paths are kept separateŠ assuming they are running this to two different routers (or even interfaces) then it

[j-nsp] Vlan question MX

2013-07-08 Thread Keith
Have this setup in the lab on some srx's but want to get some info on this. We have an upstream provider that we use a config: set interfaces ge-0/1/0 vlan-tagging set interfaces ge-0/1/0 encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services set interfaces ge-0/1/0 unit 1500 vlan-id 1500 set interfaces ge-0/