Ahh good thinking - we already do that today for some Metaswitch stuff
why didn't I think of that before? ;)
On 2013-07-25 7:50 PM, "Caillin Bathern" wrote:
>Alternatively use routed VPLS on the core box if it is also an MX and a
>standard VPLS instance on the edge:
>http://www.juniper.net/te
Alternatively use routed VPLS on the core box if it is also an MX and a
standard VPLS instance on the edge:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.2/topics/task/configuratio
n/vpls-irb-solutions.html
Or if you are game then in the next release you should get "psX"
interfaces on the MX for d
>
>
>
>lt- interfaces are definitely a way to do it. In my case I put an lt-
>interface in a VPLS instance that was paired to another lt- with "family
>inet .." in a virtual router instance. I had a routed VPLS for names
>sake. In my situation though the lt- interface doesn't move much
>traffic.
* Michael Loftis [2013-07-25 23:54]:
> Good to hear, I remembered reading that mostly because it seemed so
> wrong. I don't think I'm missing any context from the book, and I
> don't have any MPC/Trio based gear to test on myself.
I also read it in dhanks book and I wrote him on IRC about it and
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Sebastian Wiesinger
wrote:
> * sth...@nethelp.no [2013-07-25 01:21]:
>> > "When using inline IPFIX the only valid rate is 1. The option
>> > run-length isn't configurable, because there's no need to sample data
>> > from the perspective of the microcode in the Tr
* sth...@nethelp.no [2013-07-25 01:21]:
> > "When using inline IPFIX the only valid rate is 1. The option
> > run-length isn't configurable, because there's no need to sample data
> > from the perspective of the microcode in the Trio Lookup Block. Every
> > packet will be inspected and is subjec
On 7/25/2013 1:08 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Thursday, July 25, 2013 06:54:57 PM Paul Stewart wrote:
>
>> Is there a way using an L2VPN to terminate the path on a
>> loopback or other virtual interface? At the customer
>> premise, there is a physical port which could be one end
>> of the L2VPN but
Here's a full working example that I pulled off my production link. It's
comprised of a pair of 10gb links.
I renumbered things to protect the guilty.
Useful bits here are adjustments to MTU counting style to make ospf work with
jumbo frames.
interface port-channel5
description "UP-srx-o-myst
Thanks - another helpful person from the list sent me some config snippets
offline that should set me in the right direction (using LT interfaces)
Much appreciated,
Paul
On 2013-07-25 12:08 PM, "Mark Tinka" wrote:
>On Thursday, July 25, 2013 06:54:57 PM Paul Stewart wrote:
>
>> Is there a way
On Thursday, July 25, 2013 06:54:57 PM Paul Stewart wrote:
> Is there a way using an L2VPN to terminate the path on a
> loopback or other virtual interface? At the customer
> premise, there is a physical port which could be one end
> of the L2VPN but at a nearby core router I would like to
> "vir
Hey there
We have a new BGP customer coming onboard (they are pushing IP Transit from
us). One of our local POP's is actually right on their campus so we will be
handing off the service directly from an MX port.
This MX is part of our LSP mesh but it does not have a full BGP Internet
table on i
On 24/07/13 17:11, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 24/07/13 17:01, Olivier Benghozi wrote:
Hi Phil,
what is the Cisco model & IOS?
It's actually an Nexus 7009 running NX-OS.
Did you create the vlan in the vlan database in your Cisco switch? :)
Yep
Maybe try switchport nonegotiate...
No such c
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 09:01:15AM -0400, Paulhamus, Jon wrote:
> Power Supply in EX3200 Switches
> The power supply in EX3200 switches is a hot-removable and hot-insertable
> field-replaceable unit (FRU) that you can install on the rear panel without
> powering off the switch or disrupting the s
Hi,
You'll usually get this problem if in any of your rules you do not specify
the mandatory fields (source,destination,application etc).
Regards,
\Asad
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Md. Jahangir Hossain
wrote:
> Dear friend:
>
> Wishes all are fine.I am facing some problem on my IDP to in
Hello Group -
>From Juniper's website:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/reference/specifications/power-supply-ex3200.html
Power Supply in EX3200 Switches
The power supply in EX3200 switches is a hot-removable and hot-insertable
field-replaceable unit (FRU) t
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:27:23AM +1000, Luca Salvatore wrote:
> Just got a couple of new EX4550 switches... current recommended version is
> 12.2r2.5
> But I just saw tha the 12.2 train is up release 5.3.
>
> Just wondering what the rest of you guys are running and if you have any
> horr
hi,
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:48:36AM +0530, Abdullah Al Faruque Mullick wrote:
> I don't know whether MX80 boot with only USB.. can't we install the Junos in
> inbuilt storage? Can anyone confirm me the same?
remove the usb stick, reboot. it will boot from its internal storage.
you can insta
17 matches
Mail list logo
