Correct. I confused with MX-VC that supports it.
By the way, the way you get that info on CLI is using "show virtual-chassis
vc-port statistics vcp-x/y/z extensive" which is translated into the RPC
call used in the script of the KB article you posted.
On Monday, 19 August 2013, Giuliano Medalha w
There is no option for:
show interface queue vcp-x/y/z
It does not support it.
I think that the following KB solved the problem for EX8208 and
EX4200/4500/4550:
http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB27711&actp=RSS
Thanks a lot,
Giuliano
WZTECH is registered tradema
Hi Rodrigo,
some suggestions can be found here:
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/community/junos/training-certification/day-one/networking-technologies-series/a-packet-walkthrough/
HTH
./diogo -montagner
JNCIE-SP 0x41A
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:31 AM, Rodrigo Augusto wrote:
> Hi folks!
> Does an
Hi Laurent.
Is your ultimate goal to get the GRE running over IPSEC, or just a vanilla
IPSEC tunnel? Your configuration will need to change either way:
If you want GRE over IPSEC:
You need to remove the /32 on the st0.0 interface and the Openswan
rightsourceip and make them a contiguous subne
Hi folks!
Does anyone knows if can i generate traffic from mx to mx?! Like iperf or
ostinato...
Enviado via iPhone
Grupo Connectoway
Em 18/08/2013, às 16:56, Giuliano Medalha escreveu:
> People,
>
> Someone on the list have implemented virtual chassis using EX8208 before ?
>
> We are looki
People,
Someone on the list have implemented virtual chassis using EX8208 before ?
We are looking for some sample of configuration related to a firewall
filter (Ex. PROTECT-RE) for EX8208 in a Virtual Chassis Environment ?
Is it possible to use the same loopback address ? It will protect the
ex
Any resolve?
On Aug 6, 2013 10:34 AM, "Laurent CARON" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to establish a VPN tunnel between a SRX220 and an OpenSwan box.
>
> SRX is:
> Model: srx220h
> JUNOS Software Release [12.1X44-D20.3]
>
> OpenSwan: 2.6.37
>
> Both are currently hooked on a test LAN.
>
> 192.168.0.1
I guess technically any protocol would help in this case...regardless of
default advertisement. I'm guessing no protocols are possible?
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Morgan McLean wrote:
> Could you ask them to use a routing protocol and implement some logic on
> their side dictating when th
Could you ask them to use a routing protocol and implement some logic on
their side dictating when they advertise a default to you?
Morgan
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Ahmad Hasan wrote:
> BFD is not a valid option because the other end is cisco and the customer
> is
> using PBR, so based o
9 matches
Mail list logo
