Re: [j-nsp] m10 re-333 latest version of junos

I have the 768M flavor and have already upgraded the CF to 2GB. I'm currently on 8.5 and wanted to get to the latest version for these 2 lab boxes. I'll give 10.4 a shot for now. Thanks for all of the responses! On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Jerry Jones wrote: > Depends a lot of which flav

Re: [j-nsp] M5 or M10 AC power supplies

I was pretty sure the old M5/M10 were around 500W, max, total. You sure that 700W isn't just the rating on the PSU? I'd bet you only need A couple hundred total to run it unless it's fully configured...Something like this -> http://www.trcelectronics.com/View/Mean-Well/HRP-200-48.shtml On Tue,

Re: [j-nsp] m10 re-333 latest version of junos

Hi, Am 10.09.2013 21:49, schrieb N. Max Pierson: > I have a couple of old m10s with re-333s in them and I would like to > upgrade them to whatever the last version of Junos code they can run. These > are lab routers and not production. Can someone point me in the right > direction? I've seen a few

Re: [j-nsp] VPLS Multihoming on Junos - FEC confusion

Hi, Note the junos 7.5 release introduction of multi-homingstanza (under "routing-instances instance-name protocols vpls site site-name") specified in FEC 128 doc. Believe me

[j-nsp] M5 or M10 AC power supplies

I have an old M10 (not M10i) with DC power supplies. Does anyone have any AC power supplies they'd be willing to part with or trade for the 2 DC ones I have? This is just for playing around in the home lab... Alternatively, does anyone know of a cheap way to get enough DC power for these in a la

Re: [j-nsp] m10 re-333 latest version of junos

Depends a lot of which flavor you have with what memory This RE came with either 246M or 768M of memory and an 80MB flash Note: For M-series, MX-series, and T-series routing platforms, the CompactFlash card memory requirement for JUNOS software Release 9.0 is 1 GB. For M7i and M10i routing plat

[j-nsp] m10 re-333 latest version of junos

Hi list, I have a couple of old m10s with re-333s in them and I would like to upgrade them to whatever the last version of Junos code they can run. These are lab routers and not production. Can someone point me in the right direction? I've seen a few folks say 10.4 will work, but I only see the m1

[j-nsp] virtual router on mx

Hello, On my mx240 ( 11.4R5.5) i try to make virtual router with additional bgp session to my isp. Main bgp session in main routing table goes via ae0.74, extra session in vr blackhole should go via ae0.77. Problem is that there is no communication with peer in this virtual router. When i pin

Re: [j-nsp] Help: Learning routes from same ASN, cisco vs juniper

On 9/10/2013 1:28 PM, OBrien, Will wrote: > I've found an interesting issue and I wanted to get some thoughts before > talking to JTAC about it. > > > I have a few of MX480s. In the past, I've advertised a dedicated /24 from my > lab to my providers upstream. > That /24 was never learned by

[j-nsp] Help: Learning routes from same ASN, cisco vs juniper

I've found an interesting issue and I wanted to get some thoughts before talking to JTAC about it. I have a few of MX480s. In the past, I've advertised a dedicated /24 from my lab to my providers upstream. That /24 was never learned by my primary MX. The issue comes down to either the MX or t

[j-nsp] WIN Junosphere VM credits by taking the Mastering Junos Configuration Challenge!

Hi, Apologies for the wide distribution, I thought it may be of interest to someone. We just launched a remote hands-on worldwide Junos challenge. It's a tricky one, hope you like it. Take the Mastering Junos Configuration Challenge! http://juni.pr/14yzj5v Also you can subscribe to that blog

Re: [j-nsp] Curly braces in AS-path

Hi, This is an AS Set that is generated when a route is aggregated. http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4271.txt Section 5.1.6 Thanks, Antonio Sánchez-Monge Juniper Networks Want to win up to 200 Junosphere VM days? Take the Mastering Junos Configuration Challenge! http://juni.pr/14yzj5v

Re: [j-nsp] Curly braces in AS-path

Hi, AS-set normally. Used in context of aggregation.  Cheers mh  Message d'origine De : Vincent De Keyzer Date : A : juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Objet : [j-nsp] Curly braces in AS-path Hello all, the following comes from the TeliaSonera looking glass (http://lg.telia.ne

Re: [j-nsp] Curly braces in AS-path

Vincent De Keyzer writes: >What do the curly braces in the AS path mean? More generally, does someone >know a document explaining how to interpret the output of "sh route prot >bgp"? I don't see anything under "show route protocol bgp": http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos/topics/reference

[j-nsp] Curly braces in AS-path

Hello all, the following comes from the TeliaSonera looking glass (http://lg.telia.net/ ): Router: Hong Kong Command: show route protocol bgp 1.38.0.0/17 table inet.0 inet.0: 518574 destinations, 1103564 routes (518516 active, 113 holddown, 1207 hidden) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Bot

Re: [j-nsp] Curly braces in AS-path

On Sep 10, 2013, at 12:45 PM, Vincent De Keyzer wrote: > Hello all, > > the following comes from the TeliaSonera looking glass (http://lg.telia.net/ > ): > > Router: Hong Kong > Command: show route protocol bgp 1.38.0.0/17 table inet.0 > > inet.0: 518574 destinations, 1103564 routes (518516 a

Re: [j-nsp] VPLS Multihoming on Junos - FEC confusion

I understand that part, but it doesn't answer the original question. Thanks Darren http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie > From: per.gran...@gcc.com.cy > To: darre...@outlook.com; kr...@smartcom.bg > CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: RE: [j-nsp] VPLS Multihoming on Junos - FEC confusion > Dat

Re: [j-nsp] VPLS Multihoming on Junos - FEC confusion

Perhaps this is useful: https://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos/topics/topic-map/vpls-bgp-multihoming.html There are two places in the configuration where you can configure VPLS multihoming. One is for FEC 128, and the other is for FEC 129: For FEC 128-routing-instances instance-name proto

Re: [j-nsp] VPLS Multihoming on Junos - FEC confusion

That's my thought too. However even the 12.3 VPLS configuration guide states FEC128 multihoming. But again showing with BGP Thanks Darren http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 23:30:08 +0300 Subject: Re: [j-nsp] VPLS Multihoming on Junos - FEC confusion From: kr...@smartcom.bg To

Re: [j-nsp] IGMP problem

You should enable the sap protocol for the group you want to generate join messages. On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Vladislav Vasilev < vladislavavasi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Robert, > > Just noticed you actually have "ip pim passive" under the interface... > > The "ip igmp join-group" in Cisco

Re: [j-nsp] IGMP problem

Robert, Just noticed you actually have "ip pim passive" under the interface... The "ip igmp join-group" in Cisco IOS generates IGMP joins (and PIM joins upstream), and packets sent to the group address get sent up to the CPU (the router would reply back to icmp-echo packets sent to the group ad

Re: [j-nsp] IGMP problem

Hello, Actually this config generates PIM (*,G) joins upstream to RP. I'm not aware of static igmp joins(generated) or igmp proxies support in junos (excluding junosE) - though there is a feature that translates PIM to IGMP/MLD

Re: [j-nsp] IGMP problem

Hi Robert, What you have below only adds the interface to the OIL for that group. No IGMP joins are generated! Regards, Vladislav A. VASILEV On 10 Sep 2013, at 07:51, Robert Hass wrote: > Hi > I would like to setup static IGMP joins between Cisco and Juniper. > But it's not working. Juniper i

[j-nsp] IGMP problem

Hi I would like to setup static IGMP joins between Cisco and Juniper. But it's not working. Juniper is not sending IGMP Joins. Same configuration Cisco + Cisco working without issues. Any clues ? Interface configuration for Juniper at Cisco side: interface GigabitEthernet1/1/1 description Junipe