Re: [j-nsp] ip fragmentation, different mtu sizes

2013-12-20 Thread Phil Fagan
Are you trying to transit >1500 or terminate > 1500? You should be able to pass and fragment. But maybe the mgmt plane won't frag if your trying the interface itself. hi, all: i have a genetic question regarding ip fragmentation. i have two routers; one is cisco and another is juniper. they connec

Re: [j-nsp] Enabling SSL support for JunosScript invocation

2013-12-20 Thread Sebastian Wiesinger
* Saku Ytti [2013-12-02 15:54]: > On (2013-12-02 09:17 -0500), Phil Shafer wrote: > > > JUNOS uses the "fetch" app under the covers, which lacks HTTPS > > support. We're moving to "curl", which does. I don't have an > > ETA on this support. > > I believe the problem is, domestic incorrectly ca

Re: [j-nsp] J series packet mode

2013-12-20 Thread Eugeniu Patrascu
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:20 PM, wrote: > > The successor for the J series is the ACX series but you need to skip the > > lower end models as for some weird reason they come with E1 interfaces > > stuck on them. > > Um, why do you believe the ACX is the successor for the J series? The > ACX is a

Re: [j-nsp] J series packet mode

2013-12-20 Thread sthaug
> The successor for the J series is the ACX series but you need to skip the > lower end models as for some weird reason they come with E1 interfaces > stuck on them. Um, why do you believe the ACX is the successor for the J series? The ACX is a hardware forwarding box. The J series is software for

Re: [j-nsp] J series packet mode

2013-12-20 Thread sthaug
> > As I understand it the J series were originally a packet mode box > > until Juniper switched the default behaviour to flow based. Has there > > been any major architecture changes that would rule out packet mode > > operation? > > Note that they're still going to be silly and allocate

Re: [j-nsp] J series packet mode

2013-12-20 Thread Eric Van Tol
> The successor for the J series is the ACX series but you need to skip the > lower end models as for some weird reason they come with E1 interfaces > stuck on them. Where did you hear this? The ACX is purpose-built for mobile backhaul and lacks many features that both the J-Series and SRX have

Re: [j-nsp] J series packet mode

2013-12-20 Thread Eugeniu Patrascu
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Tom Storey wrote: > Yeah I did see this, but Im looking to avoid flow mode on the whole. > > On a J4350 with 2GB of RAM in packet mode I am able to push around 1Gbps Enterprise IMIX traffic with 4 full routing tables for IPv4 and full routing (~17K routes or so) I