Looks like the keywords here are anchoring VPN to an SPU. I think this
involves the way RG mappings occur on SPU(s). Anyone with info/links on
that mapping please share.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Morgan McLean wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Quick question regarding terminating IKE on a lo0 interfa
On Sunday, January 26, 2014 06:54:07 PM Misak Khachatryan
wrote:
> No, separate subnets. Th example above was from peering
> with Mikrotik.
Short of a software issue on either side of the link, might
you have any reason to suspect that the remote router has
physically moved farther into its ne
So I finally got some time to work on this again and we found the
problem it appears to be was the destination match, needed to switch to
any/any matching instead. It would appear that destination address and
next-hop don't mean the same thing, the actual destination needs to
match the destination
No, separate subnets. Th example above was from peering with Mikrotik.
Sent from my iPad
> On 25 հնվ, 2014 թ., at 19:29, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
> On Friday, January 24, 2014 03:37:33 PM Misak Khachatryan
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, that's why it's weird. As additional info, the peers
>> are Mikrotik rout
4 matches
Mail list logo