Re: [j-nsp] Class of service groups with wildcards

2014-02-07 Thread Serge Vautour
Where this gets applied depends on where you have your groups applied. For example if you do:     set class-of-service interfaces apply-groups LAYER2-COS your QOS-MAP will get applied to every interface configured under "class-of-service interfaces". If you do:     set class-of-service interfa

Re: [j-nsp] H-QoS support

2014-02-07 Thread Eric Van Tol
> -Original Message- > From: sth...@nethelp.no [mailto:sth...@nethelp.no] > > You should be just fine with 12.3. Can you share some of your config > related to the H-QoS? I'm barely at the testing phase right now. The config I was using is below, but using this config, I was unable to pi

Re: [j-nsp] H-QoS support

2014-02-07 Thread sthaug
> Thanks for the confirmation. I was aware that 10G were only port-based > queuing and I did find some more documentation that supports your statement, > but whenever I enable hierarchical queuing on MIC slot 1 (the 10-port 1G MIC) > of my MX5, I see this in the syslog: > > dcd[1415]: DCD_PARS

Re: [j-nsp] move routes from VRF to inet.0

2014-02-07 Thread Steve Hulshof
Tobias, You can use a Logical Tunnel (LT) interface on the PE to interconnect your VRF with inet.0 and exchange routes between each of them using BGP. Config example to setup LT interface with VR routing-instance but this will work with VRF as well: https://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12

Re: [j-nsp] H-QoS support

2014-02-07 Thread Eric Van Tol
> -Original Message- > From: sth...@nethelp.no [mailto:sth...@nethelp.no] > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 1:05 PM > To: Eric Van Tol > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] H-QoS support > > H-QoS is supported on the MICs, because these connect to the "Q" side of > the switching ASIC. It is *not* supporte

Re: [j-nsp] OSPF external routes

2014-02-07 Thread Olivier Benghozi
You're redistributing eBGP to OSPF. Received OSPF routes from the other ASBR will be inserted in the RIB with preference 150. Received eBGP routes will be inserted in the RIB with preference 170. So OSPF will always be preferred over BGP routes unless you change the preference via an import pol

Re: [j-nsp] H-QoS support

2014-02-07 Thread sthaug
> Can someone please confirm whether or not H-QoS is support on MX5 with a > MIC-3D-20GE-SFP? I can't believe all the searching I've had to do just to > figure this out, where the various sources I've found give very confusing and > obviously incorrect information about what's supported. For i

[j-nsp] H-QoS support

2014-02-07 Thread Eric Van Tol
Hi all, Can someone please confirm whether or not H-QoS is support on MX5 with a MIC-3D-20GE-SFP? I can't believe all the searching I've had to do just to figure this out, where the various sources I've found give very confusing and obviously incorrect information about what's supported. For i

Re: [j-nsp] OSPF external routes

2014-02-07 Thread Oliver Garraux
You should be able to set a metric via the routing policy that you're using to redistribute. Oliver - Oliver Garraux Check out my blog: blog.garraux.net Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/olivergarraux On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:37 AM, R S wrote: > I've a

[j-nsp] OSPF external routes

2014-02-07 Thread R S
I’ve a couple of OSPF ASBR router (ASBR1 and ASBR2) each one with a BGP peer with R1 and R2. 10.10.0.0/16- R1 -- BGP -- ASBR1---OSPF area 0--- ASBR2 -- BGP –R2- 10.10.0.0/16 Is there a way to manipulate in Junos the external LSA those ASBR router will generate towards OSPF area 0 in order to p

Re: [j-nsp] move routes from VRF to inet.0

2014-02-07 Thread Bastien Pilat
Hello, I may have a workable solution. As pointed by Adam, you cannot copy via rib-groups routes in VRF learned from mpBGP since they are already a copy of routes inside bgp.l3vpn table. I guess you cannot copy either routes from bgp.l3vpn table into inet.0 via rib-groups since that would copy i