I had exactly that configuration in mind.
Misak.
Best regards,
Misak Khachatryan,
Network Administration and Monitoring Manager,
GNC-Alfa CJSC.
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Tinka"
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Cc: "Ivan Ivanov" , "Misak Khachatryan"
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 201
On Saturday, May 17, 2014 01:23:29 PM Ivan Ivanov wrote:
> Which means that it should work only with
> 'vrf-table-label'
Yes, but you also don't want to two copies of the same
Multicast packet coming to the bud node.
Recommended configuration is to keep "vrf-table-label", but
also have the vt-
Hi,
This is quote from "Understanding Junos Next-generation multicast VPN"
"If a PE is a bud router, meaning it has local receivers and also forwards
MPLS packets received over a P2MP LSP
downstream to other P and PE routers, then there is a difference in how
vrf-table-label and vt work. With
vrf
On Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:07:29 AM Eugeniu Patrascu
wrote:
> You can cool a Sandy/Ivy Bridge CPU in a laptop at +40C
> degrees in direct sunlight outside (e.g. Panasonic
> Thoughbook) and they can't cool the same type of CPU in
> a datacenter with ~20-22 degrees ambient temperature and
> very
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Friday, May 16, 2014 09:20:50 PM Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> > bill-of-material, pincount, thermal might be argument,
> > they are SOC so you get everything nicely in single
> > package.
>
> I know Juniper are not thinking of anything more powerfu
On Friday, May 16, 2014 09:20:50 PM Saku Ytti wrote:
> bill-of-material, pincount, thermal might be argument,
> they are SOC so you get everything nicely in single
> package.
I know Juniper are not thinking of anything more powerful in
the MX104 due to thermal budget, but alluded to the fact
th
6 matches
Mail list logo
