On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 08:50:09 AM Krasimir Avramski
wrote:
> I didn't mention you are interested in RPT-SPT mode - I
> just thought you have local PE receivers issue that was
> typical in early days of mvpn and of course we used
> SPT-only with SSM mode.There were inherent pfe
> infrastruct
Hello Vladi,
I didn't mention you are interested in RPT-SPT mode - I just thought you
have local PE receivers issue that was typical in early days of mvpn and of
course we used SPT-only with SSM mode.There were inherent pfe
infrastructure problems with composite nh needed to dealt with direct ifl
On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 08:21:52 AM Krasimir Avramski
wrote:
> Well with the caveat that in RPT-SPT after the first
> Receiver PE travels the RPT, the (S,G) state is already
> known to remaining Receiver PEs due to bgp inherent
> protocol optimization - type-5 SA generated by source
> PE, so
>
> We used SPT-only mode and didn't see any difference in
> channel changes, because in SPT-only mode, the (S,G) state
> is already present on the Receiver PE router, so an IGMP
> Join request does not have to travel the RPT tree like if
> you RPT-SPT mode.
Well with the caveat that in RPT-SPT a
On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 04:27:27 PM Krasimir Avramski
wrote:
> I have had customer using exactly the same setup (in
> production) without any problems on receiver PE (static
> igmp local receivers for faster channel zapping).
We used SPT-only mode and didn't see any difference in
channel chang
This is a snippet from "Deploying MBGP Multicast VPNs":
*At the time of this writing, Junos OS does not support RPT-SPT mode if the
CSources*
*or C-Receivers are locally connected to the PEs. It is mandatory to have a*
*CE between a PE and a host. This limitation is specific of RPT-SPT, it
does
I have had customer using exactly the same setup (in production) without
any problems on receiver PE (static igmp local receivers for faster channel
zapping). Now I can't remember if igmp was effectively filtered on
downstream access equipment. The problem with local receivers was only on
Source PE
On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 01:13:06 PM Vladislav A. VASILEV
wrote:
> Does anybody know if this limitation still exist:
>
> Source CE --- Source PE --- MPLS Network --- Receiver PE
> --- Static IGMP under VRF interface (no Receiver CE)
>
> It works but the problem is that for no reason multicast
>
Does anybody know if this limitation still exist:
Source CE --- Source PE --- MPLS Network --- Receiver PE --- Static IGMP
under VRF interface (no Receiver CE)
It works but the problem is that for no reason multicast traffic would stop
flowing (within a few days) due to BGP withdrawing all route
9 matches
Mail list logo
