Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 L2 to MX960 L3

I assume you mean a different port on the EX going down - not the ports connected to the MX. If that is the case, you could perhaps use Uplink Failure detection, in reverse, so to say... http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB21003 http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos14

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 L2 to MX960 L3

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 09:14:03AM -0500, adfjklaufao akjvlauroe wrote: > Hello > > We connect our devices to a 4200 and run layer 2 to an AE on the 960. The > layer 3 is on the ae on the 960. Currently the layer 3 stays up when > the physical layer port is down on the 4200. Is there a way to hav

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 L2 to MX960 L3

Hi I don't think there is an easy way to do this, because the MX960 does not have any awareness past its own physical interface to the EX4200. It may be possible for you to script something. There is a new product due out soon from Juniper that allows ex4300 and qfx5100 switches to be managed by

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 L2 to MX960 L3

On 26/Feb/15 16:14, adfjklaufao akjvlauroe wrote: > Hello > > We connect our devices to a 4200 and run layer 2 to an AE on the 960. The > layer 3 is on the ae on the 960. Currently the layer 3 stays up when > the physical layer port is down on the 4200. Is there a way to have the > layer 3 shutd

[j-nsp] EX4200 L2 to MX960 L3

Hello We connect our devices to a 4200 and run layer 2 to an AE on the 960. The layer 3 is on the ae on the 960. Currently the layer 3 stays up when the physical layer port is down on the 4200. Is there a way to have the layer 3 shutdown when the physical port on the 4200 is down? Thank you

Re: [j-nsp] Merging routes from VRF to inet.0

Hi! Is it the same if would like to leak routes learned from remote PE between two VRF's on another PE, or do this "restriction" only exist when you want to leak between inet.0 and VRF? Johan On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 9:15 PM, Tobias Heister wrote: > Hi, > > Am 16.01.2015 um 20:49 schrieb Tom Ei