Yup, apply-macro is the perfect spot for stuffing data. Consider using
a top-level apply-macro with a name indicating your script, and then
the value under it:
apply-macro my-script-name {
my-parameter my-value;
other-paramer other-value;
}
Then you'll need something in your script like:
Use an apply-macro..
--
Tim
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Working on a commit script with a regex that might need occasional updates.
> Ideally, this could be stored in the config, and loaded at run-time.
> Possible?
>
> If not: any catches with abusing an
Hi all,
Working on a commit script with a regex that might need occasional
updates. Ideally, this could be stored in the config, and loaded at
run-time. Possible?
If not: any catches with abusing annotate to provide this?
Thanks,
Ross
___
junipe
Yes it is enabled, under the vlan config.
Although we have been told by ATAC that its not needed if using VRRP
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Maxwell Cole
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do you have mcae-mac-synchronize enabled in the bridge domain? (If you are
> using them)
>
>
> On 3/18/15 2:22 PM, Luca Sa
Hi,
Do you have mcae-mac-synchronize enabled in the bridge domain? (If you
are using them)
On 3/18/15 2:22 PM, Luca Salvatore wrote:
Hi,
We have multi-chassis enabled for ae0 only, do you have any juniper
document that mentions it is needed on all mc-lag links? We speak to ATAC
quite a lo
Issue we faced was mac learning not mac aging. Multi-chassis protection is not
mentioned in kb but it is required and configuring it solved the issue for us.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 18, 2015, at 10:28 PM, Luca Salvatore
mailto:l...@digitalocean.com>> wrote:
Hi,
We have multi-chassis enabl
Hi,
We have multi-chassis enabled for ae0 only, do you have any juniper
document that mentions it is needed on all mc-lag links? We speak to ATAC
quite a lot a this has never been mentioned to us.
We use static ARPs on all IRBs where VRRP is running and also for the ICL
link.
I don't think the
Hi,
I think iccp is up because you have a redundant path available using ae10 to
reach iccp peer. I faced similar issue on a customer site and had to separate
iccp link using l3 lag between chassis.
Also please check if you have multi-chassis protection enabled, we enabled it
on mc-lag interfa
Has anyone experienced a problem where an EX4200 VC was dropping
packets (30-50% packet loss or higher) across a certain VCP cable, but
the "show virtual-chassis vc-port statistics extensive" command showed
no errors, and the "request virtual-chassis device-reachability"
command didn't show any pro
here it all is.
You'll just have to trust me that the ping works between peers using the
ICCP IP.
We use public addressing on these and I don't want to post the public IPs
here. I've changed them to 10.1.1.1 and 10.1.1.2 in the output. I'm able
to ping without issue.
Some details
ae0 is the iccp
Hi, I’m wondering what people recommend for a software release for the EX 4500
switch in a virtual chassis configuration. I noted that there is 13.2 code
installed in my cluster now but the recommended version on the web site is
12.3R8 which obviously doesn’t match. What are people using and o
Sh interface mc-ae id xx
Iccp link configuration.
Ping output between chassis using iccp ips
And any one mc-lag interface config from both chassis
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 18, 2015, at 7:50 PM, Luca Salvatore
mailto:l...@digitalocean.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Yes VRRP is in use. Running 13.2R5.10, s
Hi,
Yes VRRP is in use. Running 13.2R5.10, single RE.
Running active-active
What config do you want to see? I don't want to post the whole thing.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Syed Iftikhar Ahmed
wrote:
> Is it active/ active or active/ standby setup. Config for 9200 is
> different t
13 matches
Mail list logo
