Re: [j-nsp] QFX5100 redundant RE and virtual-chassis

2015-03-21 Thread Octavio Alfageme
Thanks a lot Peter and Nitzan. Now it's clear. I misunderstood what I read and I thought that the backup RE was present not only during ISSU. Thanks a lot for your help. Kind regards Octavio On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Peter Tavenier wrote: > Same as I understood from a juniper update. >

Re: [j-nsp] QFX5100 redundant RE and virtual-chassis

2015-03-21 Thread Peter Tavenier
Same as I understood from a juniper update. Dual RE on a single chassis is only possible if there is no VC/VCF. It is intended to do a ISSU with a single unit. ISSU is hitless in best case. There is a soft-reset on the PFE. So in your VC with two QFX5100's there will be only two RE's, one on eac

Re: [j-nsp] Recommended Junos version for EX-4500 virtual chassis

2015-03-21 Thread Tore Anderson
* Scott Granados > Hi, I’m wondering what people recommend for a software release for > the EX 4500 switch in a virtual chassis configuration. I noted that > there is 13.2 code installed in my cluster now but the recommended > version on the web site is 12.3R8 which obviously doesn’t match. [..]

Re: [j-nsp] QFX5100 redundant RE and virtual-chassis

2015-03-21 Thread Nitzan Tzelniker
AFAIK The second RE is spawn only during the upgrade and shutdown after the upgrade Nitzan On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Octavio Alfageme < octavio.alfag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Soon I'm gonna have to configure a virtual-chassis of two QFX5100s. I'd be > grateful if you co

[j-nsp] QFX5100 redundant RE and virtual-chassis

2015-03-21 Thread Octavio Alfageme
Hello everyone, Soon I'm gonna have to configure a virtual-chassis of two QFX5100s. I'd be grateful if you could help me with a couple of doubts I haven't been able to solve with the manuals: * Are both REs, each one running as a different virtual-machine over Linux KVM, enabled by default when t

Re: [j-nsp] Proxmox with Multicast & Juniper EX

2015-03-21 Thread Tore Anderson
* Tore Anderson > * Jeff Meyers > > > I am mostly confused why the packets passing the core makes a > > difference at all. For my understanding, igmp-snooping inspects the > > communication and passes multicast traffic to exactly those who shall > > receive it. Why isn't this working? I read that

Re: [j-nsp] Proxmox with Multicast & Juniper EX

2015-03-21 Thread Tore Anderson
* Jeff Meyers > I am mostly confused why the packets passing the core makes a > difference at all. For my understanding, igmp-snooping inspects the > communication and passes multicast traffic to exactly those who shall > receive it. Why isn't this working? I read that this requires an icmp > quer