Hi, all.
I have just passed my JNCIS-SP certification, and am looking for
up-to-date JNCIP-SP study materials.
I knew there was an old study guide for JNCIP-M which does not cover a
number of new topics.
(And there are some behavior changes between the version in this guide
and the current versio
What causes Route Record Lookup Failures? What do you have to enable to
perform route record lookups?
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
On (2015-04-22 16:14 +0200), Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
Hey,
> I think that we will see an Intel CPU based RE on MX104 in the future.
> It just doesn't make sense to have one PPC platform for which custom
> code must be written. The MX80 will probably go EOL in that case.
Juniper has tons of non
* Mike Williams [2015-04-20 16:42]:
> Hey all,
>
> There was a discussion May last year about the MX104 and BGP performance.
> With the take away being that the MX104 RE is still pretty weak, at least
> compared to the modern x86 REs fitted to some of the "bigger" models.
> The RE-B-1800x1 in an
On 22/04/15 13:20, Farrukh Haroon wrote:
Hi Cahit
Your assumption about the order of operations seems to be wrong. If the
screen is before the filter, then how come the pings are blocked before
you start your attack script? Since your initial pings are blocked this
means the filter is working (a
Hi Cahit
Your assumption about the order of operations seems to be wrong. If the
screen is before the filter, then how come the pings are blocked before you
start your attack script? Since your initial pings are blocked this means
the filter is working (at least during normal loads)..
It is m
On 21/04/15 17:22, Cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
We are getting a spoofed ip syn attack. When attack starts and over
100K pps our SRX3600 was losting the connection. And we check the
status of the device over the Serial connection. But we could not
determine why it has been dropped the connection
What
Le 21/04/15 16:02, Raphael Mazelier a écrit :
Me again. I'm facing a problem when mixing rib-groups export and vrf
import/export.
When exporting routes from A to vrf X with rib-groups, these routes is
candidate to be re-exported in mpbgp VPN X, which is not I want (result
in routing loop).
M
Mike WilliamsOn Tuesday 21 April 2015 14:22:43 wrote:
> Client -> M-series (relay) -> (VLAN 2920) J-series (VLAN 100) -> Server
> Server -> (VLAN 100) J-series (VLAN 2980)
I fudged it by adding more IPs to the DHCPv6 server, then statically routing
to them on the M out the "right" interfac
9 matches
Mail list logo
