Hi,
I want to run OAM LFM on a OSPF/MPLS backbone (p2p links) running BFD.
primary purpose:
* detection at l2
* if there are errors, shut down the link.
* if there is udld, shut down the link.
If anyone doing something similar and can share the configuration, it would
be helpful.
I am not sure
> On Apr 30, 2015, at 4:43 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
>
> I know legally you are not supposed to use the four 10G built in ports on a
> Juniper MX5 unless you buy an upgrade license to a MX40 or MX80 level. I
> would like to know if technically will these ports work, or has Juniper
> software locke
yep, can echo this. had to upgrade my mx5 to mx80 for all the 10GE ports.
junos 13.3-ish.
ry@iad1-er2> show system license usage
Licenses LicensesLicensesExpiry
Feature name usedinstalled needed
scale-subscriber
Hi Colton,
This is now strictly enforced as of 12.2
http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB23535&smlogin=true
(login required). The interfaces will appear and be configurable but a
licence timer will countdown to zero, at which point the interfaces are
deactivated and will go dar
The good advice I got when I asked this question a few months back was
"talk to your SE". I did, and it was fruitful.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Chris Chance
wrote:
> Was wondering the same
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
> From: Josh Baird
> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 3:
I know legally you are not supposed to use the four 10G built in ports on a
Juniper MX5 unless you buy an upgrade license to a MX40 or MX80 level. I
would like to know if technically will these ports work, or has Juniper
software locked them down?
Some old posts said that they have not locked them
Was wondering the same
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From: Josh Baird
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 3:28 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] vMX availability
Does anyone know if vMX is out in the wild yet? I was under the impression
that lab/trial versions would be ava
Does anyone know if vMX is out in the wild yet? I was under the impression
that lab/trial versions would be available through re-sellers in early
March, but I haven't had any luck getting my hands on anything.
Josh
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-n
On (2015-04-30 15:33 +0100), Sascha Luck [ml] wrote:
Hey,
> >So what version does the community recommend for an MX80. Looking to make
> >the jump from 12.3 to 13.3.
>
> Does anyone have experience with 14.2 on MX80 yet?
Other than the AS65535 issue and ipfix/flow memleak, it looks fine for my
We have it in our network, installed about 3-4 months ago. We use them as PE in
our MPLS network, every function we use seems OK.
Best regards,
Misak Khachatryan,
Network Administration and Monitoring Manager,
GNC-Alfa CJSC.
- Original Message -
From: "Sascha Luck [ml]"
To: juniper-nsp@
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 09:25:33AM -0500, Colton Conor wrote:
So what version does the community recommend for an MX80. Looking to make
the jump from 12.3 to 13.3.
Does anyone have experience with 14.2 on MX80 yet?
rgds,
Sascha Luck
___
juniper-nsp
So what version does the community recommend for an MX80. Looking to make
the jump from 12.3 to 13.3.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Olivier Benghozi <
olivier.bengh...@wifirst.fr> wrote:
> MX104 is not supported in 12.3, it's that simple (13.2 minimum).
> And about features, MX104 is on par wi
Hi,
You have to look first at the IS-IS database: show isis database detail
For that prefix P, you'll see two routers advertising it, the local router R1
and the remote router R2.
( I assume say that you are advertising these prefixes with the default metric
which is 0. In any case, the explanat
MX104 is not supported in 12.3, it's that simple (13.2 minimum).
And about features, MX104 is on par with other MX only in 13.3 anyway.
Not very different on newer PTX chassis.
> Le 30 avr. 2015 à 08:18, Mark Tinka a écrit :
>
> On 29/Apr/15 18:58, Colton Conor wrote:
>>
>> I notice that the
14 matches
Mail list logo
