Re: [j-nsp] MX80 upgrade caveats

http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos14.1/information-products/topic-collections/release-notes/14.1/index.html?topic-83541.html "Support for upgrades and downgrades that span more than three Junos OS releases at a time is not provided, except for releases that are designated as Extended En

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 upgrade caveats

Hi, MX80 11.4R11 -> 13.3R5 jump was at least smooth. Other than that inline-jflow PFE memleak :) Cheers, Toni On 07-May-15 23:40, COOK, MYLES wrote: There were enough difference between 11.x and 12.x that you had to move to at least one version of 12.x before moving past. Once you are on t

Re: [j-nsp] EVPN

On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 10:41:18PM +0200, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote: > * Chuck Anderson [2015-05-05 16:51]: > > On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 05:53:54PM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > > Is anyone doing EVPN in production yet? > > > > I take it from the deafening silence that either no one is doing EV

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 upgrade caveats

There were enough difference between 11.x and 12.x that you had to move to at least one version of 12.x before moving past. Once you are on the 12.x code train jumps will be a little smoother. -Myles C -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On

Re: [j-nsp] EVPN

* Chuck Anderson [2015-05-05 16:51]: > On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 05:53:54PM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > Is anyone doing EVPN in production yet? > > I take it from the deafening silence that either no one is doing EVPN > in production, or no one is willing to admit it. > > Is anyone willing to

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 upgrade caveats

On 7/May/15 22:02, Paul Stewart wrote: > Officially I think the answer is never upgrade more than three releases at > once .. I've cheated it and got away with it - also got burnt > > So, 11.4 to 12.1 to 12.2 to 12.3 etc. If memory serves, our MX's shipped with 12, and we were able to ju

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 upgrade caveats

Officially I think the answer is never upgrade more than three releases at once .. I've cheated it and got away with it - also got burnt So, 11.4 to 12.1 to 12.2 to 12.3 etc. -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of thiyagaraja

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 upgrade caveats

http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos14.1/information-products/topic-collections/release-notes/14.1/topic-83364.html#jd0e8341 This isn't very clear, but It would appear you will need to go through a couple of versions to get there. On 7 May 2015 at 18:49, thiyagarajan b wrote: > Hi, Any c

[j-nsp] MX80 upgrade caveats

Hi, Any constraints for upgrading jmx80 from 11.4 to 14.1 directly? Warm Regards Thiyagarajan B. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] JTAC Recommended Junos Software Versions Old?

12.3R8.7 is going to be end of support next year and I'd expect Juniper to let people know what will be the recommended replacement some time before that happens so people can have some time to assess the new release and to schedule the upgrades. adam > -Original Message- > From: juni

[j-nsp] SNMP Interface counters on PPP interfaces - branch SRX

Hi all, Is there a way of obtaining the byte counters for individual ppp interfaces on a brach SRX using SNMP? Using the standard IF-MIB seems to give no traffic on pp0.X but just the straight pp0 interface counters show what looks like the aggregate of all the PPP unit interfaces on the box?