Re: [j-nsp] LACP on mixed virtual chassis QFX5100/EX4300

2015-11-03 Thread Michael Loftis
I'd take a closer look at show interfaces. When a link is 1gig QFX calls it ge-. So you can have an ex-0/0/1 and a ge-0/0/1 but only one is active as I do not believe tri rate SFP+ is supported. On Tuesday, November 3, 2015, ThienDuc Nguyen wrote: > Hi > > I was trying to create a LACP bundle be

[j-nsp] LACP on mixed virtual chassis QFX5100/EX4300

2015-11-03 Thread ThienDuc Nguyen
Hi I was trying to create a LACP bundle between two ports : one on a EX4300, the other on a QFX5100. Both link have their speed negotiated at 1GE (but the interface name on the QFX is xe-, I can't force it to ge-, and their are no way to force the speed on the QFX). if I set the lacp speed to 1ge,

Re: [j-nsp] Limit on interfaces in bundle

2015-11-03 Thread Saku Ytti
On 3 November 2015 at 17:19, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > But I like your example with the Entropy label. > What if the topmost label value or even better the VPN/VC label could > indicate how to parse the remainder of the packet. > And if a middle node or end node(in case of a VPN/VC label) doesn't

Re: [j-nsp] Limit on interfaces in bundle

2015-11-03 Thread Adam Vitkovsky
> From: Jesper Skriver [mailto:jes...@skriver.dk] > Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 10:34 AM > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 06:30:00PM +, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > > Adam Vitkovsky IP Engineer T: 0333 006 5936 E: adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk W: www.gamma.co.uk This

Re: [j-nsp] Limit on interfaces in bundle

2015-11-03 Thread Saku Ytti
On 3 November 2015 at 12:08, Jesper Skriver wrote: > I magine you have 4 routers in a line A-B-C-D, router A sends > packets with different ethertypes depending on payload, but router > B doesn't have the ability to preserve this, so all MPLS packets > leaving B has the same ethertype. Now regard

Re: [j-nsp] Limit on interfaces in bundle

2015-11-03 Thread Jesper Skriver
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 06:30:00PM +, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > -Original Message- > > From: Jesper Skriver [mailto:jes...@skriver.dk] > > Sent: Monday, November 02, 2015 5:14 PM > > > > > > Right, on those types of platforms it can be done - assuming there are spare > > bits in the meta

Re: [j-nsp] Limit on interfaces in bundle

2015-11-03 Thread Jesper Skriver
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 01:22:49AM +0200, Saku Ytti wrote: > On 2 November 2015 at 19:14, Jesper Skriver wrote: > > Right, on those types of platforms it can be done - assuming there > > are spare bits in the meta data that goes with the packet, enough > > free instruction space etc - but it will