On 15/Jan/16 00:09, Saku Ytti wrote:
> Pretty sure it's as wire-rate as MPC1, MPC2 on SCBE system.
Yes, but I think the OP wants to buy the SCB.
Mark.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/j
> From: Saku Ytti [mailto:s...@ytti.fi]
> Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 12:45 AM
>
> On 15 January 2016 at 01:39, Christopher E. Brown
> wrote:
> > The 30Gbit nominal (actual 31.7 or greater) limit per trio applies to
> > the MPC1 and 2 cards but the quad trio interconnect in the 16XGE is
> > wir
> From: Christopher E. Brown [mailto:chris.br...@acsalaska.net]
> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 11:39 PM
>
>
> In the datasheets for the 16XGE since release Juniper specifically called out
> 120G due to bus limit with SCB.
>
> Not in the sheet but actual is guaranteed 30G per bank of 4.
>
> We
Thanks for the replies, but I am not interested in the 16XGE card. The
configuration I am referencing would be this:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Juniper-MX960BASE-AC-10x-DPC-R-4XGE-XFP-MS-DPC-1yrWrnty-Free-Ship-40x-10G-MX960-/351615023814?hash=item51dde37ac6:g:WUcAAOSwLVZViHc~
Should I run into any pr
We actually spent a couple years spooling up for a greenfield build of a
network required
to provide very tight SLAs on a per service bases.
We were working with the MX BU directly for almost 2 years and constantly
exchanging test
results and loaner/testing cards.
Per specs provided by the des
A strategy that I've seen used is to pick some ip address and add a static
route for it pointing to discard on every router. Then when you receive
the route to black-hole, set the next-hop to the discard route. This way
all routers will drop traffic for the prefix as soon as it enters the
router
On 15 January 2016 at 01:39, Christopher E. Brown
wrote:
> The 30Gbit nominal (actual 31.7 or greater) limit per trio applies to the
> MPC1 and 2 cards
> but the quad trio interconnect in the 16XGE is wired up diff with additional
> helpers and
> can do the full 40G per bank.
There is actually
On 15 January 2016 at 01:39, Christopher E. Brown
wrote:
> The 30Gbit nominal (actual 31.7 or greater) limit per trio applies to the
> MPC1 and 2 cards
> but the quad trio interconnect in the 16XGE is wired up diff with additional
> helpers and
> can do the full 40G per bank.
Pretty sure this
In the datasheets for the 16XGE since release Juniper specifically called out
120G due to
bus limit with SCB.
Not in the sheet but actual is guaranteed 30G per bank of 4.
We used first 4 of each bank in heavy core use and behavior is as specified.
With change to SCBE this limit is removed and
What route preference is your IGP route, and what IGP? I assume your
discard/static has a route preference of 5? Also, do you mind pasting
the show route extensive output? Is your static discard route in the
same routing-instance/VRF as the BGP prefix?
/Charles
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Jo
On 1/14/16 2:48 PM, Jeff wrote:
> Am 14.01.2016 um 23:19 schrieb Christopher E. Brown:
>>
>>
>> Agree, mixing DPC and MPC is a terrible idea. Don't like DPC to begin
>> with, but nobody in their right mind mixes DPCs and MPCs.
>>
>
> Why is that? The mentioned 16x 10G card actually sounds interes
> Christopher E. Brown
> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 10:20 PM
> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX960 with 3 RE's?
>
>
> It is 120Gbit agg in a SCB system as the limit is 120G/slot.
>
> This is in the form of 30Gbit per TRIO and 1 TRIO per 4 ports.
>
> So, use 3 of 4 in
With 2 active SCBs (2+0 non-redundant or 2+1 redundant in a 960) you are
capable of 120G
per slot.
The worst case throughput in this case would depend on the cards.
For single Trio MPC1 in would be 30Gbit per card (actual 31.7 to ~ 39 depending
on packet mix)
For dual Trio MPC2 it would be sa
> Jeff
> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 10:47 PM
> To: Mark Tinka; Colton Conor; Tom Storey
> Cc: Juniper List
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX960 with 3 RE's?
>
> Am 14.01.2016 um 06:45 schrieb Mark Tinka:
> > The 64-bit RE gives you more memory to hold more routes, but if you
> > only need 4x full B
On 1/14/2016 1:48 PM, Jeff wrote:
> Am 14.01.2016 um 23:19 schrieb Christopher E. Brown:
>>
>>
>> Agree, mixing DPC and MPC is a terrible idea. Don't like DPC to begin
>> with, but nobody in their right mind mixes DPCs and MPCs.
>>
>
> Why is that? The mentioned 16x 10G card actually sounds inter
Am 14.01.2016 um 23:19 schrieb Christopher E. Brown:
Agree, mixing DPC and MPC is a terrible idea. Don't like DPC to begin
with, but nobody in their right mind mixes DPCs and MPCs.
Why is that? The mentioned 16x 10G card actually sounds interesting but
is still quite expensive compared to
Am 14.01.2016 um 06:45 schrieb Mark Tinka:
The 64-bit RE gives you more memory to hold more routes, but if you
only need 4x full BGP feeds today, the RE-S-2000 should be fine.
Naturally, the newer RE will provide longer-term support for later
Junos releases (especially with the architectural di
So assuming I got with something like this setup:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Juniper-MX960BASE-AC-10x-DPC-R-4XGE-XFP-MS-DPC-1yrWrnty-Free-Ship-40x-10G-MX960-/351615023814?hash=item51dde37ac6:g:WUcAAOSwLVZViHc~
That has RE-2000's, Regular SCBs, and all DPC linecards. Would these all be
able to run at
It is 120Gbit agg in a SCB system as the limit is 120G/slot.
This is in the form of 30Gbit per TRIO and 1 TRIO per 4 ports.
So, use 3 of 4 in each bank if you want 100% line rate.
SCBE increases this to 160Gbit or better (depending on age of chassis)
allowing for line rate on all 16.
Agree, m
On 14 January 2016 at 23:11, Mark Tinka wrote:
Hey,
>> A surplus dealer recommended the MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP-R-B, which is less
>> than $1k/port used. But it only supports full bandwidth on 12 ports,
>> would be oversubscribed 4:3 if all 16 are in use. They are Trio chipset.
> I wouldn't be too
Martin T writes:
>/* rlogin to second RE */
>var $cmd_login_other_re = "request routing-engine login
>other-routing-engine";
>var $cmd_login_other_re_results = jcs:invoke( $cmd_login_other_re );
If you want to talk to the other RE (or any remote host), you'll need
jcs:open() which ret
Martin T writes:
>However, script above returns an empty line.
$line is a node-set, but you are making a string out of it. XPath
specifies that when you turn a node-set into a string, it "is
converted to a string by returning the string-value of the node in
the node-set that is first in document
On 14/Jan/16 20:55, Jim Troutman wrote:
> I'm also very curious about inexpensive MX480/MX960 10G routing
> options for use as MPLS P or maybe PE routers.
>
> A surplus dealer recommended the MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP-R-B, which is less
> than $1k/port used. But it only supports full bandwidth on 12 p
Hi!
I have implemented RTBH in my small network of 8 routers. DFZ is running in
a L3VPN and each router has an multihop ibgp-session with my RTBH-router
and it works, but I have one thing that annoys me.
If I announce an offending IP to be black holed, only one of the routers
will point to the di
I'm also very curious about inexpensive MX480/MX960 10G routing options for
use as MPLS P or maybe PE routers.
A surplus dealer recommended the MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP-R-B, which is less than
$1k/port used. But it only supports full bandwidth on 12 ports, would be
oversubscribed 4:3 if all 16 are in u
Hi,
jcs:break-lines() function in SLAX allows one to break content into
multiple lines. For example here I break the output of "show chassis
mac-addresses" into lines:
version 1.0;
ns jcs = "http://xml.juniper.net/junos/commit-scripts/1.0";;
match / {
{
var $sh_mac_results = jcs:invoke(
Wojciech,
I didn't know that, thanks! However, I also tried with jcs:open(),
jcs:execute() and jcs:close() but this didn't change anything:
$ cat login_to_other_re.slax
version 1.0;
ns jcs = "http://xml.juniper.net/junos/commit-scripts/1.0";;
import "../import/junos.xsl";
match / {
{
/
Mark,
Thanks for the information.What is the smallest non-DPC 10G card you would
recommend? I am probably going to have a hard to getting away with DPC due
to the cost. A 4 port 10G DPC card can be had for under $1K on the used
market.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> O
Hi Martin,
I believe that jcs:invoke() is just a shortcut for jcs:open(),
jcs:execute() and jcs:close(), so you get a new connection each time you
execute jcs:invoke().
Regards,
Wojciech
2016-01-14 10:23 GMT+01:00 Martin T :
> Hi,
>
> while I am aware of jcs:open() function, which allows one to
Hi,
while I am aware of jcs:open() function, which allows one to execute
commands on other routing-engine, I was wondering if following logic
is also possible in SLAX:
$ cat login_to_other_re.slax
version 1.0;
ns jcs = "http://xml.juniper.net/junos/commit-scripts/1.0";;
import "../import/junos.x
$junos-context variable works perfectly!
PS. Thanks for writing such book! I made a pre-order for printed version.
Martin
On 1/14/16, Phil Shafer wrote:
> Martin T writes:
>>Junos has "banner" XML element under "rpc-reply" and "cli" hierarchy:
>
> This is really only available between cli and
31 matches
Mail list logo