Re: [j-nsp] Optimizing the FIB on MX

2016-02-21 Thread Mark Tinka
On 18/Feb/16 16:12, Saku Ytti wrote: > Define underpowered? > > MX80 has 8572, also sported by platforms such as sup7, sup2t, nexus7k, > me3600x, sfm3-12@alu > RSP720, EX8200 RE have even slower spec cpu 8548 > > MX104 has faster cpu than any of these, P5021. Yet RSP720 runs circles > around MX1

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper ACX

2016-02-21 Thread Mark Tinka
On 9/Feb/16 17:34, Saku Ytti wrote: > ACX covers many boxes with different HW. ACX2k is BRCM Enduro, as is > Cisco ASR901. My comments are about ACX2k. > > > VPLS is not supported, and I don't think it ever will be. > > Only way to protect control-plane would be forwarding filter where you > mat

Re: [j-nsp] Acx5048 vpls vlan-id

2016-02-21 Thread Mark Tinka
On 5/Feb/16 22:58, Giuliano Medalha wrote: > There is no chance to use this box in projects with this limitation, because > other vendors with the same chipset have this feature running ok. So you are sure this is not a problem of the Broadcom chip inside the ACX5000? Mark. __

Re: [j-nsp] Optimizing the FIB on MX

2016-02-21 Thread Adam Vitkovsky
> Dragan Jovicic [mailto:dragan...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2016 1:28 PM > > I had a peek at JunOS documentation; regarding "protect core" and newer > unicast/labeled "protection" commands - they seem to do the same thing. I think the "protection" (for L3VPN) is actually older than

Re: [j-nsp] Enable EVPN on existing mpls l3vpn network

2016-02-21 Thread Adam Vitkovsky
> Eric Oosting [mailto:eric.oost...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 3:17 PM > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 4:14 AM, Adam Vitkovsky > wrote: > > tim tiriche > > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 6:44 PM > > > > Hello, > > > > I have an existing L3VPN network with NSR. > > > > If i want to