Re: [j-nsp] MX960 2x MS-MPC-128

2016-02-26 Thread Michael Loftis
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote: > Further info: > > I just requested a restart of the FPC and for once it came online, but > now I'm seeing the following: The oinker there may be "normal" during bringup. As for the power up, check /var/log/chassisd

Re: [j-nsp] MX960 2x MS-MPC-128

2016-02-26 Thread Giuliano Medalha
The PS are in high power mode ? Position 0 Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 26, 2016, at 17:19, Josh Reynolds wrote: > > 4 High Output AC supplies, only 3 16x10Gbps cards installed with no > optics in them yet > > Power is okay, it's not doing anything yet :P Good idea though! > >> On Fri, Feb

Re: [j-nsp] MX960 2x MS-MPC-128

2016-02-26 Thread Josh Reynolds
4 High Output AC supplies, only 3 16x10Gbps cards installed with no optics in them yet Power is okay, it's not doing anything yet :P Good idea though! On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > Not enough power to power up the card? > > show chassis power > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 a

Re: [j-nsp] MX960 2x MS-MPC-128

2016-02-26 Thread Chuck Anderson
Not enough power to power up the card? show chassis power On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 01:50:44PM -0600, Josh Reynolds wrote: > Hi all. > > Pair of MS-MPC-128's. 1st card boots, second card doesn't. Swapped FPC > locations, now the 2nd card boots in the first card's spot, but the > 1st card won't boo

Re: [j-nsp] MX960 2x MS-MPC-128

2016-02-26 Thread Josh Reynolds
Further info: I just requested a restart of the FPC and for once it came online, but now I'm seeing the following: Message from syslogd@ at Feb 26 19:53:29 ... fpc11 SCHED: Thread 40 (TNPC CM) ran for 1625 ms without yielding Message from syslogd@ at Feb 26 19:53:29 ... fpc11 Scheduler Oinke

[j-nsp] MX960 2x MS-MPC-128

2016-02-26 Thread Josh Reynolds
Hi all. Pair of MS-MPC-128's. 1st card boots, second card doesn't. Swapped FPC locations, now the 2nd card boots in the first card's spot, but the 1st card won't boot in the previous spot of the 2nd card. Have tried several other slots for the 2nd card the with same results. show chassis hardware

Re: [j-nsp] "load replace" junoscript login class permissions

2016-02-26 Thread Chuck Anderson
Can you please provide an example of what you are saying should work (in text format even)? This is what I was trying in XML (from perl) and it doesn't work with the permissions restricted to "policy-options prefix-list AUTO-.*", but it does work with the permissions widened to "policy-options .*"

Re: [j-nsp] MX960 with two SCBEs and redundancy

2016-02-26 Thread Dave Bell
All ports will remain active, but the bandwidth that each PFE has available will drop by 50%. I believe on that card, there are 4 PFEs, each with around 78Gbps. If you don't need to use all ports, and you select the ones you use carefully, you will be able to lose an SCBE without dropping any perf

[j-nsp] MX960 with two SCBEs and redundancy

2016-02-26 Thread v
Hello, we would like to build a MX960 with two SCBEs and just two line cards (2x MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP-R-B) for the beginning. What happens if one of the SCBEs fails in such a configuration? Will we still have full performance on all ports of our two line cards? Will the performance drop by 50%? O