Hello,
Perhaps you should just try and combine the graphs in whatever graphing
software you are using and police them to their commit on both ports.
Then the customer is responsable for controlling the active/backup and the BW
usage. You just bill them on what they use since you don’t care how t
On 14/Jul/16 16:14, Harald F. Karlsen wrote:
>
>
> IMO this should rather be solved with a clause in your customer
> contract. I'm pretty sure this is not something you will se very often.
We see it all the time.
Mark.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
On 14.07.2016 15:14, Cydon Satyr wrote:
Hi,
I understand, but if you are forcing customer to always use primary link
if it is up, and customer advertises his routes over backup link ONLY,
then he can go around uRPF restriction.
With uRPF you are assuming he advertises all of his routes over prim
On 14/Jul/16 15:14, Cydon Satyr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I understand, but if you are forcing customer to always use primary link if
> it is up, and customer advertises his routes over backup link ONLY, then he
> can go around uRPF restriction.
> With uRPF you are assuming he advertises all of his route
Hi,
I understand, but if you are forcing customer to always use primary link if
it is up, and customer advertises his routes over backup link ONLY, then he
can go around uRPF restriction.
With uRPF you are assuming he advertises all of his routes over primary
link where router can prioritize them.
On 7/13/16 1:41 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 13/Jul/16 10:36, Cydon Satyr wrote:
>
>> What would be the optimal way to deal with following scenario.
>>
>> The customer of ours has a primary bgp connection over primary link on one
>> router, and a backup bgp connection (up) on backup link on ou
Hello,
https://www.juniper.net/uk/en/training/jnbooks/day-one/networking-technologies-series/deploying-cgnat/
has all necessary info for MS-DPC CGNAT.
To adapt CGNAT config for MS-MPC "MS" interfaces, all You need is to
substitute SP interfaces for MS interfaces.
Your service filters part l
On 14.07.2016 01:43, Cydon Satyr wrote:
uRPF check doesn't work since customer can just advertise his routes over
backup link.
I had some hopes for conditional bgp advertisement and SCU/DCU but I don't
think it works not to mention it's like trying to kill a bee with a hammer.
I'm talking about
Hi Cydon,
MC-LAG will provide the functionality you are looking for using
active/standby mode.
The active/standby mode is also available on both DPC and MPC hardware.
Alan
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Cydon Satyr wrote:
> uRPF check doesn't work since customer can just advertise his route
9 matches
Mail list logo
