Re: [j-nsp] EXP based LSP selection

Hi, But since the policy is matching everything, then all routes in inet.3 will > be altered right? > More importantly all the routes in mpls.0. Since this is most likely a bgp-free router it could very well not use inet.3. But you can be more specific in your policy, see bellow. I suspect that

Re: [j-nsp] EXP based LSP selection

Hi Dragan, Thank you very much for the response Please see the comments inline > Dragan Jovicic [mailto:dragan...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2016 11:36 AM > > Hello, > In lab, tested and works as following. Traffic arrives as MPLS (LDP in control > plane) on a core router , and then is

Re: [j-nsp] EXP based LSP selection

Hello, In lab, tested and works as following. Traffic arrives as MPLS (LDP in control plane) on a core router , and then is forced to whichever RSVP LSP depending on EXP bits. The key is to run LDP tunneling over RSVP LSPs - as the route in control plane must point over these tunnels. Traffic that

[j-nsp] pppoe access internal routes to rib-group

Hi all I'm trying to copy pppoe (access internal) routes to rib-group x, noting that I've already copied the interfaces and dynamic routes, but the access internal routes are not copied. I think there should be something to be congiured under dynamic profiles or something like that that allows me