Re: [j-nsp] MPC-3D-16XGE-SFP

2016-08-31 Thread Josh Reynolds
O I'm sorry you are absolutely right. I'm thinking about EX4500 ports for some reason. I remember having to use a 10G uplink port on a switch to connect in to a port on that line card for a 1g device as an emergency bandaid now that I think about it. On Aug 31, 2016 7:02 PM, "Dragan Jovicic"

Re: [j-nsp] MPC-3D-16XGE-SFP

2016-08-31 Thread Dragan Jovicic
Those are specifically 10G ports not 1G. We run these on some of our MX960 and MX480, both toward core and edge. They are fine high density 10G cards. Things to note. Card has 4 PFE; each MQ chip is good for ~70Gbps give or take +/- 10Gbps depending on packet sizes. This packet memory bandwidth is

Re: [j-nsp] MPC-3D-16XGE-SFP

2016-08-31 Thread Josh Reynolds
Is it actually SFPP? If so, I've had a couple of these. With a regular SCB you can only run line rate on 12 ports. With the enhanced SCB you can run line rate on all 16, if memory serves. Supports GE and 10G SFP modules. I don't know about any warnings or concerns on your chassis as I ran these on

[j-nsp] MPC-3D-16XGE-SFP

2016-08-31 Thread John Brown
Hi, I've received some pretty good pricing on the MPC-3D-16XGE-SFP card, and was wondering what the list.wisdom is ?? We are an ISP. That will be the usage. Some ports will have BGP, many will be static routed. Will this run full line rate on all 16 ports ? Can I run multiple ISP type clie

Re: [j-nsp] IPv6 traceroute over 6PE

2016-08-31 Thread James Jun
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 03:50:26PM -0500, kwor...@gmail.com wrote: > I have a simple lab setup using logical systems on an MX80 and I???m trying > to get trace route to work from CE1 <-> PE1 <-> P1 <-> PE2 <-> CE2 using ipv6 > and I always get loss on the 2nd hop although it completes after the

[j-nsp] IPv6 traceroute over 6PE

2016-08-31 Thread kworm83
I have a simple lab setup using logical systems on an MX80 and I’m trying to get trace route to work from CE1 <-> PE1 <-> P1 <-> PE2 <-> CE2 using ipv6 and I always get loss on the 2nd hop although it completes after the timeouts. Any clues would be appreciated. Traceroute output: kevin@lab>