Re: [j-nsp] vMX

Hi Alexander, Paul, Thank you very much for that information, it will be very helpful. The thing which I don't understand is when I change ( vm_instance=“0” to vm_instance=“2” ) in my boot/loader.conf file do I need to add second vFPC virtual machine and how to connect it to vCP VM. @Aaron, Th

Re: [j-nsp] vMX

Thanks Alexander, I'm using olive/vMX within virtual box, and then it shows up in my GNS3 environment. Working very nice at the moment. I'd love to do the dual RE thing you mentioned for testing GR, GRES, NSR, ISSU is that possible ? If so please let me know where the boot/loader.conf is

Re: [j-nsp] QoS when there is no congestion

H, interestingly, I'm getting word from someone that is running test traffic through my network that they are seeing out of sequence with small test frames (64 or 68 bytes)but any frames larger than that are fine. Your mention of "reordering" gives me concern. I wonder how/where I would so

Re: [j-nsp] Explicit Null - IP/MPLS QoS

Thanks Adam, Cisco asr9k (sniffer)-- juniper acx5048cisco me3600(loopback 0 is 10.101.12.251) ping 10.101.12.251 type 184 (executed on cli of 9k) -pinging - Q1 - If you have the

Re: [j-nsp] vMX

Hi Alexander / Stefan, Those parameters will change the behavior for vMX into an internal build as they are used to simulate different chassis types for engineering during development. I really don't suggest this be done using them with vMX images as the personality/behavior of the image will

Re: [j-nsp] vMX

Hi Yes ! By changing parameters in the boot/loader.conf you can change certain behavior vm_chassis_i2cid="21" for MX960, "33" for MX480, and "48" for MX240 vm_ore_present=“0” for a single RE; vm_ore_present=“1” for dual REs vm_instance=“0” for the the RE, the first FPC slot; vm_instance=“1” for

[j-nsp] vMX

Hello everyone, Is there someone who is familiar with vMX? I have installed vMX under VMWARE and I wanted to know if it's possible to add more than one FPC. I could find any documentation about that. Thanks. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck

Re: [j-nsp] QoS when there is no congestion

> Andrey Khomyakov > Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 4:27 PM > > I think this is where I was misunderstood. Firstly, "proper" user > *shouldn't* (see points about policers) hurt, but "proper" requires research > into your whole network. The point I was making was based on the OP's > initial statem

Re: [j-nsp] QoS when there is no congestion

On Nov 14, 2016, at 6:19 PM, Ross Halliday wrote: > > This is called a "microburst", and WILL cause packet delay and reordering if > the buffer isn't large enough. Anyone operating an IP SAN should be familiar > with this concept. This is a big issue issue with switches used for iSCSI, > such

Re: [j-nsp] Explicit Null - IP/MPLS QoS

Hi Aaron, > Aaron > Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 11:23 PM > > > I had something in the lab where I was I was marking IP header with DSCP 46 > (TOS 184) but sniffer on the span shown below was showing that the dscp > was seen as 0 (aka CS0) .also seeing no underlying mpls tag. I wasn't > s