Hi all, We're just now looking at a similar requirement to Alex, and was wondering what the current thoughts are on vMX.
Perhaps 2 or 3 Gbps, several full BGP views, maybe quite a lot of flowspec routes (100s possibly), various filter-based-forwarding, a logical system or two, and under 15 gigE ports (we'd use KVM and PCI passthrough). Junipers MX line lacks the routing-engine horsepower at the throughput scale we're expecting. If the MX104 had better routing engines maybe things would be different. Many thanks. On Friday 09 September 2016 17:27:52 Alex Valo wrote: > Dear All, > > I am just wondering if anybody here is using Juniper vMX in production with > success? We have a project with a very small budget. The first phase will > be about 200 Mbps (6 months), then 500 Mbps (6 to 12 months) and finally 3 > Gbps (12 months and beyond). > > Our design: > > - 2 routers with iBGP/OSPF between them > - 4 eBGP sessions with 1 Gbps from upstreams with full view > - 2 eBGP sessions with 1 Gbps downstream with full view > - a few static route subnets > - filtering using regular route maps and traffic engineering using BGP > communities - syslog of all event > - sFlow/NetFlow/IPFIX on the upstreams interfaces > > Looking for some feedbacks: > > Anybody keen to share their experience on either or both of these platforms? > Anything to be specifically aware of? > Which hardware do you use? > What are you traffic level? > Did it work? Is it bullet-proof? > > Looking forward to your messages and feedbacks. > > Alex > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Mike Williams _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp