Re: [j-nsp] improving global unicast convergence (with or without BGP-PIC)

Admittedly this late to arrive follow up may not be J specific. Our transit extensions aren't really traditional metro ethernet circuits, topology looks more like following a-vlanXbc-vlanX---d The "shared l2" device connects several .edu institutions into major aggregation faciliti

Re: [j-nsp] bgp peer flapping

How often do we rename bgp group names ? I don't ever. Wondering if this is something that people do often. -Aaron ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] bgp peer flapping

> james list > Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 4:55 PM > > Dear all > I’ve a question: is it correct from your point of view that if I change the > BGP > group name on my MX the BGP peer inside the group goes to flap ? > Very hard for me to comment without being sarcastic. It's just another gre

Re: [j-nsp] bgp peer flapping

* james list [2017-04-26 17:55]: > Dear all > I’ve a question: is it correct from your point of view that if I change the > BGP group name on my MX the BGP peer inside the group goes to flap ? Yes that is "correct" for JunOS AFAIK. I think the reason was that the data structures for the group get

[j-nsp] bgp peer flapping

Dear all I’ve a question: is it correct from your point of view that if I change the BGP group name on my MX the BGP peer inside the group goes to flap ? Ie: *replace pattern test1 with test2* *# show | compare* *[edit protocols bgp]* *+group test2 {* *+type external;* *+