HI all, I'm having issues with vpls's going down and coming back up and not
fully restoring to Cisco ASR9000's. Once I bounce a portion of the Juniper
ACX5048 routing-instance for the vpls, then it restores and functions. (I
can also clear ldp neighbor x.x.x.x on the asr9000 side and that seems t
* Alain Hebert [2017-05-02 13:18]:
> Hi,
>
> Beside Juniper, anyone have some successful experience to share about a
> second source of QSFP+-40-LR4?
>
> All the optics tested from our usual rock solid providers ended up
> flapping or spamming log message :(
Hi,
we use Flexoptix Q.
hi all,
Is there a way i can math l2vpn ( specific signalling , safi 65 vpls ) on
ingress ?
Looks like from family l2vpn is not available:
set term 1 from family ?
Possible completions:
evpn EVPN family
inet IPv4 family
inet-mdt IPv4 M
Hi,
Beside Juniper, anyone have some successful experience to share
about a second source of QSFP+-40-LR4?
All the optics tested from our usual rock solid providers ended up
flapping or spamming log message :(
Thank you for your time.
PS: Our QFX5100 VCF Fabric (6) is f
On 2 May 2017 at 11:30, wrote:
>> James Bensley
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 9:28 AM
>>
>> Just to clarify, one doesn't need to enable indirect-next-hop because it
> is
>> enabled by default, but if it were turned off for any reason, I presume it
> is a
>> requirement for PIC Edge? Or is it rea
> James Bensley
> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 9:28 AM
>
> Just to clarify, one doesn't need to enable indirect-next-hop because it
is
> enabled by default, but if it were turned off for any reason, I presume it
is a
> requirement for PIC Edge? Or is it really not required at all, if not, how
is th
On 27 April 2017 at 14:41, wrote:
>> James Bensley
>> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 9:13 AM
>>
>> It might be worth pointing out that on Cisco you need to enable PIC Core for
>> PIC Edge to work at its best.
> So it's either Core or Core+Edge.
That's pretty much the point I was trying to make,
7 matches
Mail list logo
