I would be looking at the QFX10K or the QFX52xx series. Chat with your account
team for the latest.
Jared Mauch
> On Nov 12, 2017, at 10:14 AM, Stephen Fulton wrote:
>
> Jason,
>
> For the ASR9001, the MX104 is better than the MX80. I'd look at the MX204
> for a bit more future proofing -
Jason,
For the ASR9001, the MX104 is better than the MX80. I'd look at the
MX204 for a bit more future proofing - 8x 10G ports and 4x 100G, looks
like break out cables are an option for adding lower speed interfaces.
-- Stephen
On 2017-11-12 10:08 AM, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
Hey there,
I’m l
Hey there,
I’m looking to get a basic handle on the Juniper equivalent to some Cisco kit
that’s out there.
For a NCS5001 comparison, the use case is a simple ISIS, LDP BGP-Free P Core
LSR. QFX5110 seem to be closest. Fair?
For a NCS5501-SE comparison, the use case would be for a peering rout
> Chris Burton
> Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2017 11:50 PM
>
> This has been discussed a few times on this list and other forums. That being
> said, if you are looking to do this with Linux bridge you will need to modify
> the net/br_private.h header library to remove the mask restriction placed
4 matches
Mail list logo