Hello Serge and thank you.
Yes, there are indeed, not that many cases for ALB. That's why I turned to
community.
Thank you for sharing your experience.
בתאריך 18 בנוב' 2017 1:41 AM, "serge vautour"
כתב:
> Hello,
>
> We have been using it for a while. Works great. We have a few small links
> i
Sure.
But it depends on the exact circuit you have (on the exact equipment and
settings your carrier uses). Since MACSec is true point-to-point protocol,
carriers' equipment may interpret its' packets (say EAPOL), as destined for
itself - instead of forwarding it thru the pseudo wire.
As far as I
In the end I discovered that CCC, l2circuit, etc. work fine for
transporting regular MACsec, no need for "WAN MACsec" or special
commands to forward dot1x frames.
I also got this to work with 2 links at the same time between the same
2 switches. The problem I was having was related to using 1g SF
Hello,
We have been using it for a while. Works great. We have a few small links
in a LAG bundle with a small number of fat flows over them. Without
adaptive LAG the flows would sometimes hash on the same link. With adaptive
LAG they are always split.
I agree that there probably aren't many use c
I think juniper gear has some mics that supoort macsec ... for mx 17.3
JNP-MIC1-MACSEC
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/macsec-overview-mx-series.html
Or you can use a DCI to do it ... together with your router ... but maybe in
100G interfaces only ... will chec
Hello Giuliano and thank you.
It would be MPLS traffic and Juniper facing Juniper.
בתאריך 18 בנוב' 2017 1:08 AM, "Giuliano C. Medalha"
כתב:
> Alex
>
> What type of traffic ?
>
> MX is very good for load balance because of TRIO chipset ... that is able
> to strip down the frames and the packets
* As long as you have pure p2p links, you should be fine - Juniper gear
meant.
בתאריך 18 בנוב' 2017 1:20 AM, "Alex K." כתב:
> Yes,
>
> But unfortunately (as far as j-nsp is considered), using Ciscos' gear.
>
> Cisco has a special flavor of MACSec, intended to address that issue
> exactly - they
Yes,
But unfortunately (as far as j-nsp is considered), using Ciscos' gear.
Cisco has a special flavor of MACSec, intended to address that issue
exactly - they call it WAN MACSes. We was able to use across many different
SP circuits. As long as you have pure p2p links (real or stimulated), you
sh
Alex
What type of traffic ?
MX is very good for load balance because of TRIO chipset ... that is able to
strip down the frames and the packets ... necessary for the hash of LAG circuits
Is IP traffic or MPLS traffic ?
Maybe on new boxes like mx10003 and mx204 you can create high capacity LAG
Hello everyone,
A customer of mine, is looking forward for a technology able to load
balance a traffic across a LAG.
The LAG in question comprised of Ethernet link and can grow from a few
links (4) to say, 20 - as required bandwidth grows. The gear is MX boxes.
Since I'm familiar with adaptive l
10 matches
Mail list logo