Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] LACP between router VMs (James Bensley)

2017-12-02 Thread Chris Burton
For better or worse I do remember those days, though I was referring to recent hardware switches/bridges (should have clarified that).  To my knowledge that only applies to things like the STP protocols, but I could be wrong, again would need to read through the specifications again to be sure

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 v MX104

2017-12-02 Thread Raphael Maunier
You can split the 100G port in order to to 4*10G ( with a 40G qfsp ) So you can do a 24*10G router if you don’t need the 100G ( Raphael PS : New remote is ordered ( I used the Juniper Repair kit to fix the previous one ^^ On 02/12/2017 17:02, "juniper-nsp on behalf of Raphael Mazelier" wrote

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 v MX104

2017-12-02 Thread Raphael Mazelier
On 02/12/2017 16:26, Raphael Maunier wrote: There is no licence for the ports, I already made my first quote for a customer last week on this product Rebate are also lower not the same than the MX chassis. It’s not the same product, only 10G/100G, no interfaces cards, no services cards … This

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 v MX104

2017-12-02 Thread Raphael Maunier
I don’t have the info yet. But that was not the need for the first project for the MX204 I asked for the detailed datasheet (not available today). On 02/12/2017 16:35, "Duane Grant" wrote: Hi Raphael, Do you know which versions support hqos and how many queues? Thanks!

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 v MX104

2017-12-02 Thread Giuliano C. Medalha
I agree The best product in years !!! Amazing and powerfull Giuliano C. Medalha WZTECH NETWORKS +55 (17) 98112-5394 giuli...@wztech.com.br From: juniper-nsp on behalf of Raphael Maunier Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2017 1:26:50 PM To: Vincent Bernat Cc: junip

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 v MX104

2017-12-02 Thread Raphael Maunier
You are right must add 10k$ forgot to mention it And of course SVC for support From: "Giuliano C. Medalha" Date: Saturday 2 December 2017 at 16:42 To: Raphael Maunier , Vincent Bernat Cc: "juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net" Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX80 v MX104 You must buy junos license for mx204 beca

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 v MX104

2017-12-02 Thread Giuliano C. Medalha
You must buy junos license for mx204 because its not included as BB Our SE has confirmed it. And maybe a service contract too ( checking it ) Giuliano C. Medalha WZTECH NETWORKS +55 (17) 98112-5394 giuli...@wztech.com.br From: juniper-nsp on behalf of Raphael M

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 v MX104

2017-12-02 Thread Duane Grant
Hi Raphael, Do you know which versions support hqos and how many queues? Thanks! /Duane > On Dec 2, 2017, at 10:26 AM, Raphael Maunier wrote: > > There is no licence for the ports, I already made my first quote for a > customer last week on this product > Rebate are also lower not the same

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 v MX104

2017-12-02 Thread Raphael Maunier
There is no licence for the ports, I already made my first quote for a customer last week on this product Rebate are also lower not the same than the MX chassis. It’s not the same product, only 10G/100G, no interfaces cards, no services cards … This is the best MX product for years, I’m glad to

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 v MX104

2017-12-02 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 2 décembre 2017 14:58 GMT, Raphael Maunier  : > Price-List: > MX204 40350 $ 2M fib / 6M rib & 32 vrf > MX204-IR 48350 $ No fib/rib limit (datasheet > performances) but 32 vrf > MX204-R 64350 $ No limit

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 v MX104

2017-12-02 Thread Raphael Maunier
Price-List: MX204 40350 $ 2M fib / 6M rib & 32 vrf MX204-IR 48350 $ No fib/rib limit (datasheet performances) but 32 vrf MX204-R 64350 $ No limit From: Colton Conor Date: Saturday 2 December 2017 at 15:4

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 v MX104

2017-12-02 Thread Colton Conor
I was about to say check out the MX204 or MX150 if it meets the need. These are newer boxes. Anyone have an idea what the list price is for both of these boxes? Do they have locked features, or special upgrades like the MX5-80 had? On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Raphael Maunier wrote: > Go fo

Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] LACP between router VMs (James Bensley)

2017-12-02 Thread adamv0025
Hey, > local link and not forwarded by the soft bridge by default (I do not know of > any hardware bridges that allow you to disabled this restriction, if you know > of any I would be interested. > My understanding is that Carrier-Ethernet grade switches/routers should allow you to peer/drop/tu

Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] LACP between router VMs (James Bensley)

2017-12-02 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 1 décembre 2017 21:43 -0800, Chris Burton  : > LACP and LLDP (and the like) are link local only protocols (would need > to dig through the specifications to find the exact rules), they > should not be forwarded by the bridge 802.1Q-2005, 8.6.3 and 8.13.4. However, some bridges are allowed to

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 virtual chassis

2017-12-02 Thread Victor Sudakov
Doug McIntyre wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 08:57:07AM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: > > We are planning to add backup switches in a Virtual Chassis > > configuration to our existing EX4200s. > ... > > If I have a standalone EX4200, should I power it off before plugging > > in the Virtual Chassis