Re: [j-nsp] Enabling tunnel services on MX480

I’ve never had an issue. -Scott H > On Jun 15, 2018, at 4:15 PM, Nelson, Brian wrote: > > On a production MX480, will a traffic impacting event occur when > enabling tunnel services on an MPC3E NG PQ & Flex Q FPC with > with 10X10GE SFPP? (SCB2 enhanced) > > thanks > Brian Nelson > >

[j-nsp] Enabling tunnel services on MX480

On a production MX480, will a traffic impacting event occur when enabling tunnel services on an MPC3E NG PQ & Flex Q FPC with with 10X10GE SFPP? (SCB2 enhanced) thanks Brian Nelson ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.ne

[j-nsp] VPN interface naming on MX platforms

This is probably a noob question, but I can’t seem to find the answer in the Juniper docs. On some MX routers where there are IPSec VPNs implemented, they use the sp-1/0/0 interface in the VPN, on other MX routers, they use the ms-0/2/0 interface. I suspect the answer lies in the details of th

Re: [j-nsp] Taking down VPLS unit with OAM CFM

* Pierre Emeriaud [2018-06-15 11:00]: > > is it possible to mark a VPLS site interface unit as down when OAM CFM > > signals a fault over that unit? > > It's possible. Try something like this: > > > root@lab-mx80-2# show protocols oam ethernet connectivity-fault-management > > action-profile vl

Re: [j-nsp] Taking down VPLS unit with OAM CFM

> is it possible to mark a VPLS site interface unit as down when OAM CFM > signals a fault over that unit? It's possible. Try something like this: > root@lab-mx80-2# show protocols oam ethernet connectivity-fault-management > action-profile vlan-down event { adjacency-loss; } > action { >

Re: [j-nsp] negation operator in SLAX

Hi Martin, There is not() : https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/reference/scripting/junos-script-automation-function-xslt-not.html On 14-Jun-18 23:39, Martin T wrote: Hi! I have quite often used "!" negation operator familiar from other languages. For example: /* If